Print

Email story

Comment

Letter to the editor

Either way, succotash is primed for a good year

Corn is hot, but so are soybeans, leaving farmers with a big decision.

ST. LOUIS - On his central Illinois farm, Kyle Winklemann has a quandary - for farmers, certainly an enviable one.

Corn took up about two-thirds of the 27-year-old grower's 1,800 acres last year, with soybeans taking up much of the rest. Winklemann made out well with both. Corn fetched lofty prices, driven at least in part by the ethanol production reliant on it, while soybeans are commanding prices not seen in decades.

Come this spring, many farmers may be beckoned back to the beans, although Winklemann still isn't sure what he'll do. It's a matter of economics: With prices of soybeans narrowing the gap with corn recently, there's better profit potential in beans because they're cheaper to grow than corn.

That's not to say that corn is a laggard; the grain recently has fetched $4 a bushel or more.

So what's a farmer to do?

"The markets are so volatile, no one knows what they're going to do," Winklemann said from his farm near Tallula, Ill., just northwest of Springfield.

When it comes to deciding what to plant, "we'll make that decision when it comes around," he says, noting that his choices may be influenced by such factors as the high costs of fertilizer and fuel.

A shift from corn to beans may be inevitable, given the context. U.S. farmers harvested a record 13.1-billion bushels of corn in the fall on nearly 93-million acres planted, in many cases cutting their soybean acreage for corn's sake to take advantage of high prices fed by demand for ethanol, the corn-based fuel additive.

Now, many observers see U.S. farmers moving 4-million to 6-million of those corn acres back into soybeans to take advantage of prices that have soared for that commodity, lately beyond $11 a bushel - a price not seen since the early 1970s.

"Last year, there was a clear economic signal that the market wanted more corn acres, and farmers responded in a big way," said Randy Winter, an Illinois State University professor of agricultural economics. "As we sit here today, that message is a lot more fuzzy."

Citing a late-November survey of some 750 growers, Farm Futures magazine estimates that farmers are planning to plant 88-million acres of corn in the spring, down about 5-million from this year. Acreage of soybeans should be about 69.5-million, up nearly 6-million acres, the magazine forecasts.

To rotate or not?

Growers generally like to rotate their acreage, growing soybeans one year and corn on that acreage the next to keep pests, weeds and diseases from getting too much of a foothold on any certain crop. Planting consecutive crops on the same land also can crimp yields.

But in many cases last spring, farmers tempted by higher corn prices went with that crop again, dropping soybeans out of the rotation.

Now, costs of what farmers call "inputs" - the items that go into producing a crop - have risen sharply, helping make the decision of whether to bring soybeans back to the rotation easier for many growers.

An example: Corn craves nutrients such as nitrogen, and costs of nitrogen fertilizer - and anhydrous ammonia, the most common form of that fertilizer - have skyrocketed, making soybeans potentially more lucrative.

A recent University of Illinois study that took in such expenses as seed, fertilizer, chemicals, fuel, labor and machinery repair projected that the cost of growing corn was $330 an acre. The cost for soybeans? Only about $200 an acre.

Throw in the high price of soybeans - lately fetching $10 to $11 a bushel, compared with the $6.50 to $7 price a year ago - and the potential returns can be hard to ignore.

Still, there's demand for both crops. U.S. inventories of soybeans, adequate last year to weather the pullback in acreage, will need to be replenished next year.

[Last modified January 2, 2008, 23:36:08]