Video report
- For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
- More video reports
|
News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Homestead exemption promise doesn't add up
Amendment 1 won't double the exemption, as the governor claims.
By ALEX LEARY, Times Staff Writer
Published January 8, 2008
TALLAHASSEE - Doubling the homestead exemption! The idea sounds simple, significant - and it's Gov. Charlie Crist's No. 1 weapon in selling the property tax cut plan that goes before voters Jan. 29. The poll-tested concept has rolled off his tongue in public appearances from Miami to Tallahassee. He used it again Monday in Broward County to promote passage of Amendment 1. But to say the measure would double the current $25,000 homestead exemption is misleading. The provision does not apply to school levies, which make up about 40 percent of the average property tax bill statewide. Taxes for cities, counties and special districts make up the other 60 percent. Crist would be more accurate to say the measure would "increase" the exemption. The overall impact equates to getting another $15,000 exemption, not another $25,000. For the average homeowner, that translates to a savings of $240 annually, according to the governor's estimates. "I've been describing it as an iPod for every Florida homestead," joked state Rep. Dan Gelber, D-Miami Beach, who opposed the plan. The increased homestead exemption would cut taxes for homeowners about $4.6-billion over five years. In 2007 there were 4.4-million homesteads in Florida and the exemption (low-income senior veterans get an extra break) reduced the tax roll by $111-billion, or 15 percent. Earlier property tax cut plans would have doubled the exemption, which has been at $25,000 since 1980. The idea was a centerpiece of Crist's bid for governor in 2006. It was favored by lawmakers because it is easy to understand and polls showed it had high approval. More than anything, "doubling the homestead" was viewed as the vehicle for success on Jan. 29. But Crist and the Republican-led Legislature were forced to exclude schools from the mix to satisfy Democrats and some Republican senators, whose votes were critical to placing the plan on the ballot. Voters who enter the polls in three weeks will read that the exemption does not apply to schools, so there is no attempt to mislead. But Crist and other backers do not readily supply that caveat when talking about the plan in public. "If you can help us say it better, that would be great," said Sen. Mike Haridopolos, R-Melbourne, who helped lead the tax discussions through the regular legislative session and two special sessions. "I say it's better than what you have currently, and it's moving the ball forward," Haridopolos said. "This is the first step in our plans to cut property taxes." Crist could not be reached Monday. He spent the morning in Hollywood, mainly emphasizing the other part of the proposal - a concept known as "portability." "This tax cut allows home-owners the portability to take their Save Our Homes tax savings with them when they move, and it doubles the homestead exemption providing great savings for Floridians," Crist said in a statement after visiting with a family that would benefit from portability. "Amendment 1 will bring real tax cuts to real people." Exaggerated or not, the plan faces significant hurdles. Crist is opposed by a broad coalition of teachers, firefighters and others who say the cuts will provide little relief to those who really need it - the plan does little for businesses, for example - while hurting local services. But opponents need to mind the facts as well. Some have decried the plan as cutting more than $12-billion from local governments and schools. That used to be true, but the worsening housing economy has led state economists to put the five-year savings at $9.3-billion. This story, which also appears on tampabay.com, is an expansion of PolitiFact, a project of the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly to help determine the truth in politics. For analysis of the presidential campaign, turn to politifact.com. The statement "This tax cut ... doubles the homestead exemption providing great savings for Floridians." - Gov. Charlie Crist, in a statement Monday after visiting a family in Broward County that would benefit under the tax proposal. The ruling What the Florida governor says on the stump about doubling the state's $25,000 homestead exemption doesn't match what lawmakers actually put on the Jan. 29 ballot. To win enough votes from Democrats and some Republican senators, Republican leaders exempted school taxes from the provision that adds an additional $25,000 homestead exemption. School levies make up about 40 percent of the average overall property tax bill statewide, leaving only 60 percent of taxes affected by the additional homestead exemption created under Amendment 1. So, the impact will be more like getting an additional $15,000 exemption (60 percent of $25,000), not another $25,000. Since the new homestead exemption would be worth only about 60 percent of what supporters say it is, we rule this statement half-true. Sources: Ballot Summary, Amendment 1, Jan. 29 ballot, election.dos.state.fl.us; Florida's Property Tax Study Interim Report, Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research, Feb. 15, 2007; "Senate Reveals Final Tax Proposal," St. Petersburg Times, Oct. 29, 2007; Impact of Property Tax on Average Homeowner, Executive Office of the Governor, Florida House of Representatives.
[Last modified January 7, 2008, 22:50:13]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Judy
|
02/16/08 09:25 AM
|
|
Charle crist GET a clue,,, Pll aren't going to come here an pay for other pll's amenities,,Big bussinesses are leaving no jobs no pll no pll no HIGH taxes,, The cutes need to start at the top,, crist your killing us an fla,, hello ,,
|
|
by Judy
|
02/16/08 09:18 AM
|
|
I think everyone is smoking crack juice who think the soh is fair,,, Bussinesses are NOT coming to fla,, People are"t coming here ,,The homestead pll who think it's fair ,, wait till your out of a job , then try to pay your low taxes up the sale taxe
|
|
by Judy
|
02/16/08 09:09 AM
|
|
I'm a landlord ,, My piece of rental property taxes are 3,000 not including insur,,,,, my neighbor only pays 1,200 ,, It's not fair,,,, taxes are taxes period,,, No one group should have to pay more,,We get hit on both ends here,, with the cap ga tax
|
|
by Brian
|
01/21/08 04:25 PM
|
|
What I don't get is that our taxes have increased 100% in 6 years due to the housing boom. Have our services increased 100%? No, our government has just taken their extra budgets and used it for more pork. Lower the millage rates!!!!! Cut back!!
|
|
by Richard
|
01/21/08 09:56 AM
|
|
I agree with Dave: The language is misleading. Assessed values between $50,000 and $75,000 will be exempt. Is one to assume that the assessed values less than $50,000 are exempt? Where is the guarantee that the present $25,000 will still apply?
|
|
by Steve
|
01/17/08 12:50 PM
|
|
Actually, now that I took the time to read and understand the law, it great. SOH will be portable. I'd prefer to see SOH wiped out to be more fair, but I'll take this whole package as a fair compromise. I'm voting YES!!!!
|
|
by Bruce
|
01/17/08 12:20 PM
|
|
Those of you who bought your homeand now cry foul because your neighbors tax bills are less should have considered that prior to buying!!! Now we are supposed to suffer, I dont think so
|
|
by Dave
|
01/10/08 08:50 AM
|
|
This does nothing for anyone whose home is valued at less than $50,000, so it provides no help for those of us that have seen the taxable value of our property increase from 30,000 to close to 50,000 in the past few years. I'll vote NO!!!
|
|
by sherry
|
01/09/08 03:22 PM
|
|
BEFORE SOH, A 20% INCREASE IN VALUE MEANT A 20% INCREASE IN TAXES. & THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED YEAR AFTER YEAR TO ALL SECOND HOMES, RENTALS & COMMERCIAL. AS THEY BAIL OUT, ALL VALUES FALL. SOH SHOULD HAVE PROTECTED ALL PROPERTY FROM BIG GOVERNMENT.
|
|
by Ron
|
01/09/08 01:34 PM
|
|
Just another example of the feckless Republican party leadership. The "new constitutional amendment" will do exactly nothing for us harried taxpayers.
|
|
by Rose Marie
|
01/09/08 12:14 PM
|
|
It seems that's all we hear from the Replublicans, never the real thing that is promoted, starting in Washington.
|
|
by Bob
|
01/08/08 08:55 PM
|
|
PEOPLE WITH HOMES THAT HAVE ASSESED VALUES UNDER $75,000 WILL NOT ENJOY THE $25,000 ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD!
|
|
by Sal
|
01/08/08 04:48 PM
|
|
Portability is the key in this amendment. Vote yes to have something you can hang your hat on if you are NOT leaving FL. The Times never points out that most business owners are homeowners too, they get everything this bill has to offer.
|
|
by Casey
|
01/08/08 04:43 PM
|
|
Johan, get real, the Democrats don't want to cut property taxes at all. They are mostly tax & spenders. We are lucky to get this on the ballot. So let's passed this amendment first & work to get more relief. Like they say, "A bird in the hand is bett
|
|
by Stan
|
01/08/08 04:35 PM
|
|
Portability could save FL residents thousands. It could save us near $6000 if we ever wanted to move. We are voting YES on Amendment 1.
|
|
by NG
|
01/08/08 04:25 PM
|
|
Government is always in your pocket, what else is new? So many people have lost everything they worked so hard for. Might as well be homeless.
|
|
by robert
|
01/08/08 03:36 PM
|
|
Vote Yes and for Seniors,Disabled Vets and Disabled on SSI need the break and take it with to move!
|
|
by steve
|
01/08/08 03:13 PM
|
|
Jim i am neither rich no a renter but i do own a holiday home and i for one are fed up with paying through the nose for services i do not use. Along with many others i shall get out of Fl asap unless a fairer stystem to all home owners is introduced.
|
|
by Hillary
|
01/08/08 02:46 PM
|
|
KILL SOH, BEFORE IT KILLS US !!!
|
|
by Bill
|
01/08/08 02:22 PM
|
|
ANYTHING that ADDS to my checking account balance ADDS up TO ME and my whole neighborhood
|
|
by JP
|
01/08/08 01:47 PM
|
|
When everyone in the state is willing to pay a state income tax we can do something about the property taxes. Until then this is all just fluff.
|
|
by Bills
|
01/08/08 01:45 PM
|
|
I love SOH as it kept my taxes way low for years. I'm a long time home owner and think it's far I pay less than you. I got this nest egg when prices were cheap, but now you think I should pay more in taxes. Huey I say. My taxes just hit 25.00 a year
|
|
by Joanne
|
01/08/08 01:42 PM
|
|
My first question would be why should 1st time buyers get special treatment. We were all 1st time buyers at 1 time or another. How does Indiana do it? There taxes aren't like ours and they have homesteaded exempt.Maybe we need to solicit outside he
|
|
by John
|
01/08/08 01:00 PM
|
|
I am hoping this smoke and mirrors amendment shows everyone how ineffective Crist really is. I also hope that this love fest for Crist ends. Hey Chalie, try doing something up there.
|
|
by John
|
01/08/08 01:00 PM
|
|
People forget life before SOH - when if property values increased 20%, property taxes increased 20%. Can you afford a 20% tax hike year after year? (such as 2004-2006) I can't. I support SOH and I'm 32 and bought my first home 2 yrs ago.
|
|
by Chris
|
01/08/08 12:58 PM
|
|
If this tax plan is approved, you will see a far worse condition then money in your pocket. I deal with Cities and Counties budgets and understand what will happen to our services if this tax plan is approved. It will not help our current conditon.
|
|
by John
|
01/08/08 12:47 PM
|
|
google "RESPONSIBLE GROWTH, RESPONSIBLE TAXES" and put better solutions on the ballot.
|
|
by Cricket
|
01/08/08 12:45 PM
|
|
I totally agree with the re-appraisal.
I bought my house in August of 2005 for $210,000. This year it appraised at $185,000, still paying taxes on the $210,000. NOT FAIR!!!!
|
|
by kitty
|
01/08/08 12:42 PM
|
|
Barry, portability is only good for long-time Florida homeowners. Your tax burden will be further shifted to first-time home buyers, people moving into the state, snowbirds and business owners. I pay 3x what my neighbors pay, and I don't complain.
|
|
by Jim
|
01/08/08 12:00 PM
|
|
"Real issue" or not, what is up with your negativity here? Are you willing to vote down something that helps real estate/the economy? I don't see any of your solutions on the ballot, want to wait another year for a break? You must be rich or renters!
|
|
by Sandy
|
01/08/08 11:59 AM
|
|
I am finally looking to build a home later this year, but the taxes and insurance may prove too high a hurdle for me. Fairness for first time home buyers is needed!
|
|
by johan
|
01/08/08 11:51 AM
|
|
If the opponents of the measure say it's only $240 cut on average, then why oppose it? Consider it a down payment and those that oppose it (Rep. Dan Gelber, D-Miami Beach, et. al.) can bring a larger cut (phase II) in the next session.
|
|
by Jen
|
01/08/08 11:43 AM
|
|
I checked my tax appraisal for this year, and homes' value went down a huge $800! I would be lucky if I could sell at that price! Give me a break, the whole system is broken. Where's that sales tax plan Rubio had? It sounded much fairer than current.
|
|
by Johan
|
01/08/08 11:40 AM
|
|
Bottom line -- your property taxes will go down and local government must reduce expenses. Since we are incapable of capping expenses to inflation or 3% / year per capita, this is the only solution to cut spending.
|
|
by Harold
|
01/08/08 11:32 AM
|
|
The truth is Big Bussiness no longer pay its tax share. Less than 3% pay state corp. income tax if any. Estate tax no longer exsist. Tax exemptions galore in Florida. Our politicians and corporate media don't want these facts revealed to the public
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|