News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Report: Insurers fleece public
Consumer groups say property owners pay too much, get too little.
By TOM ZUCCO, Times Staff Writer
Published January 11, 2008
The property insurance industry not only racked up near-record profits in 2007 - about $65-billion after taxes - but overcharged American homeowners an average of $870 per household over the last four years, says a new report from major consumer groups.
That study's conclusion - insurers systematically overcharge consumers and underpay claims - was released Thursday by the Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union and several other consumer groups. The findings blasted a powerful industry about to be challenged anew in Florida on several alleged price-gouging fronts by the state government.
The report by the Consumer Federation, one of the nation's largest and long-standing consumer watchdog organizations, was based on insurance industry data and the companies' financial statements. It estimated insurance industry profits from 2004-2007 at more than $253-billion.
Robert Hunter, director of insurance for the CFA and author of the study, accused the industry of "methodically overcharging consumers, cutting back on coverage, underpaying claims and getting taxpayers to pick up some of the tab for risks the insurers should cover."
Nowhere is that better illustrated, Hunter said, than in Florida, where nearly two-thirds of the property insurance risk is shouldered by the state in the form of Citizens Property Insurance and the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund.
The insurance industry argued that the numbers offered by Hunter - an actuary, former state insurance commissioner and former federal insurance administrator - are wrong. Bob Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute, said that if Hunter included all costs associated with writing insurance, his study would show that for 2004-2005, insurers paid more in claims than they collected in premiums.
One striking finding in the Consumer Federation report is that the insurance industry keepsan increasing portion of the premiums. In the 1980s, insurers returned 72 cents for every $1 of premium charged to policyholders either through benefits or claims. But that figure has steadily shrunk to about 55 cents in 2007, even in years with no major natural disasters.
Hartwig said insurers are investing their available funds heavily in bonds, which offer quick access to their money in the event of a catastrophe. But they are returning smaller and smaller returns to the insurers.
"And if you are getting less from investments," Hartwig said, "you need more from premiums. That the loss ratio the percentage of premiums returned to policyholders is falling because insurers want to increase profits ... that is a total fiction."
Besides writing the CFA report, Hunter helped calculate rate reductions called for by the state Legislature last year. The new law has met with mixed success, and the state is taking several steps to find out why.
The Florida Senate on Thursday created a special committee to address the issue. The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation will hold a two-day public hearing next week with executives of Allstate, which has requested a 42 percent rate hike. And Gov. Charlie Crist last month appointed three lawyers to look for grounds for a class-action lawsuit against the industry for potential collusion.
Insurance companies have found ways around the risk of the business, Hunter charged.
He pointed to 1992, the year Hurricane Andrew struck Florida and insurers paid $1.21 for every $1 they took in.
By 2005, when the Gulf Coast was hit by more costly hurricanes Katrina and Wilma, Hunter said the companies paid back just 72 cents on every $1 of premium.
"They actually made money in the homeowner line," he said of the 2005 hurricane season. "That's pretty shocking."
Not to Charlie Rutz. The Clearwater retiree this month paid his State Farm homeowners premium of $3,200 - nearly twice what it was two years ago.
"Insurance was put together to spread the risk," Rutz said, "and the companies should get a fair return. But billions of dollars? These guys are robbing us. The only thing they don't have is the mask and the gun."
Tom Zucco can be reached at zucco@sptimes.com. Take a look
A summary of the report can be found at http://www.consumerfed.org/releases.cfm.
[Last modified January 11, 2008, 01:25:07]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dave
|
01/16/08 11:24 AM
|
|
Don't forget cherry picking profitable properties and dumping high risk properties on the state. The insurance industry has Tally in their hip pockets and we, the state of FL, keep voting the same spineless insiders back in. Shame on us.
|
|
by David
|
01/11/08 10:41 PM
|
|
If these figures are correct, these companies should be paying our premiums for one or two years. An insurance co. paid and is still paying after some of their agents hornswagled some of its clients.
|
|
by mike
|
01/11/08 08:48 PM
|
|
Did you see that all the Insurance Companies Crying wolf for Tort Reform are suing uncle sam for BILLIONS regarding Katrina. I say give them each the 25k limit like they want for us. What say you?
|
|
by Dionysis
|
01/11/08 08:32 PM
|
|
What else is new? These prikks have been raping us for years. Bob Butterworth put them in thir place as AG but he is no longer AG. Help us Bob!
|
|
by Dan
|
01/11/08 08:08 PM
|
|
What gets me is having to pay a surcharge on my ins premium that goes to Citizens Ins. I've never filed a claim(13 yrs) so i guess I'm helping those that live in high risk areas, that have filed claim(s).
|
|
by lin
|
01/11/08 06:56 PM
|
|
can't afford it, take the house.
|
|
by John
|
01/11/08 05:21 PM
|
|
The state should take over all homeowners insurance & premiums.
Rates would be cut by 30-40% imo.
|
|
by David
|
01/11/08 05:15 PM
|
|
These insurance people are crooks who need to go to jail. Hopefully Crist will be able to do something about them. Of course jeb would not have.
|
|
by Ang
|
01/11/08 04:34 PM
|
|
This is no surprise. All insurance companies are a BIG MONEY MAKING BUSINESS. They love to take your money and hate to pay out when you need it. Who's to blame? The politicians.
|
|
by Greg
|
01/11/08 03:58 PM
|
|
My next door neighbor has been in the same home for 29 years with the same insurer, Allstate, and has never filed a claim...yet they are dropping them! What a joke.
|
|
by T
|
01/11/08 02:49 PM
|
|
Erik, are you for real? Most don't have a choice. It's REQUIRED if you have a mortgage.
|
|
by oh puleeze
|
01/11/08 02:46 PM
|
|
You an insurance lobbyist, Pat?
|
|
by Don
|
01/11/08 02:41 PM
|
|
Insurance companies give millions to politicians who write favorable laws and regulations that allow the insurance industry to have their way with the public.Want to see a change? Stop their cash flow by not paying your premiums that the law mandates
|
|
by John
|
01/11/08 02:26 PM
|
|
Why do you suppose if there is so much excess profit to be reaped in Florida Homeowner Insurance that all the major carriers are systematically reducing policies. Would you leave a market you were making a lot of money in? Think about people.
|
|
by Norma
|
01/11/08 02:19 PM
|
|
Want to help fight these blood sucking insurance companies you should all check out this group trying to do something about it instead of just complaining....www.hacfl.org
|
|
by Pat
|
01/11/08 01:40 PM
|
|
1. Insurers have had a return of -37% in Fl Homeowners since 1990 2. Insurers have made an underwriting profit only 2 times since 1978 3. Insurer returns are among the worst of all industries. 1 good year doesn't payback for the years of losses.
|
|
by Darren
|
01/11/08 01:23 PM
|
|
"Insurance companies systematically overcharge customers and underpay claims?" Really? Surprise, surprise. Vote Edwards. He is the only one who not only won't take insurance company soft money, but also spent the last decade holding them accountable.
|
|
by Erik
|
01/11/08 01:11 PM
|
|
If it's such a bad deal, then why are you buying it?
|
|
by tina
|
01/11/08 12:57 PM
|
|
Mr. Hunter made a very misleading comment when he insinuated Florida shouldered 2/3 of property risk through Citizens Property Insurance and the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe; and just HOW are these FUNDS funded...by INSURANCE COMPANIES NOT THE STATE
|
|
by Jjinn
|
01/11/08 12:48 PM
|
|
There is nothing criminal about insurers being entitled to make a profit, and the profit needs to be high enough to attract capital. Why would anyone invest money in a company returning less than 10% when there are many much returning much more?
|
|
by jk
|
01/11/08 12:24 PM
|
|
We need a STUDY to tell us this? DUH!
|
|
by David
|
01/11/08 12:21 PM
|
|
This is collusion between the insurance companies and the Insurance Commissioner. Unfortunately, the problem has now come home to roost. Insurance is about spreading the risk -- not making Exxon-like profits! Greedy pigs always get slaughtered.
|
|
by Otto T.
|
01/11/08 11:48 AM
|
|
Corporate greed is rampant and part of the American way of life. The insurance industry is basically self regulated and free to do whatever they want. Government offers little protection by design. Insurance stores are on every corner...
|
|
by Mike
|
01/11/08 11:19 AM
|
|
I know that there have been some crazy business practices going on out there in the insurance industry. However, there are some carriers that are not gouging. Typically, the people who pay the most have claims every yr or worse, let coverage lapse.
|
|
by Tom
|
01/11/08 10:57 AM
|
|
I've been insured with American Strategic Insurance since Aug 1999 with no claims filed. Since Aug 2005 my annual premium went from $1283 to $2583 and Aug 2006 from $2583 to $5884. In Aug 2007 it would have been $6317 but I found Citizen.
|
|
by Grumpy
|
01/11/08 10:47 AM
|
|
What ever happened to the proposed legislation requiring insurance companies who write automobile policies to also write homeowner's policies. If they write one type of policy, they should be required to write the other.
|
|
by J.
|
01/11/08 10:15 AM
|
|
Of course they RIP us off. This is the bad side of capitalism. When there are to few companies and there is no competition (or there is collusion), consumers get ripped off. Our government lets it go on. Maybe the democrats will change this.Doubtful
|
|
by Michele
|
01/11/08 09:46 AM
|
|
NO SHOCKER THERE! But will anyone do anything about it? I thought price GOUGING was against the law? For one thing we have to insure "other structures". If you have no "other structures" you still pay. Since when do we have to insure the atmosphere?
|
|
by kathy
|
01/11/08 09:22 AM
|
|
WEll now will this report change anything? When do I get my refund?????
|
|
by ROBERT
|
01/11/08 09:08 AM
|
|
Obviously the rate reductions called for by the Senate last year have gone on a deaf ear. It's that same- old same-old. Alleged rate reductions;less coverage. I guess the 3 lawyer look covers it all. Makes you wonder who's getting greased.
|
|
by Lucy
|
01/11/08 09:07 AM
|
|
I have always thought of insurance as legislated blackmail.
|
|
by Taylor
|
01/11/08 08:59 AM
|
|
Thank you Mr. Rutz-I couldn't have said it better.
|
|
by jes
|
01/11/08 08:58 AM
|
|
um...no duh...
|
|
by Kathy
|
01/11/08 08:51 AM
|
|
We have been with Nationwide for over 20 years, never made a claim and been in the same house the entire time.They paid us back this year by doubling our insurance and creating a 2000.00 escrow shortage for us-WASN'T that thoughtful of them! Thanks!!
|
|
by Marilyn
|
01/11/08 08:48 AM
|
|
These huge companies need more accountability.
|