Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Judge tosses SOLV suit; city gains time to make decision
Undaunted, Save Our Little Village says the petition items will go to election.
By NICK JOHNSON, Times Staff Writer
Published January 16, 2008
ST. PETE BEACH
The first round of a legal battle between the City Commission and a pro-development political group ended last week when a circuit judge dismissed the suit brought by Save Our Little Village Inc. The lawsuit was an attempt to force the city to hold elections for the six petition items brought by SOLV in November. Judge David A. Demers dismissed the suit on the basis of its being premature. The city charter allows the commission 90 days to act on any petition items brought by citizens, a deadline that will not be up until mid February. "It gives us enough time to get the response from our special counsel," Commissioner Ed Ruttencutter said. Ruttencutter, who was named as a defendant in the suit, along with the rest of the commissioners and mayor, has been particularly vocal in questioning the legality of the petition items. The commission has retained lawyer Thomas W. Reese to determine if the six items, one of which is a comprehensive plan, are legal and what the options are in responding to them. "We were arguing that the city had not taken a position yet, and that's what the judge said," Reese said in response to the order. SOLV organizers were undaunted by the decision, which they say solidifies their position: The city will breach its own charter if it fails to act within the 90-day period. "There's no option for the city. The petitions must go to an election," chairwoman Lorraine Huhn said. But it remains to be seen if the commissioners, many of whom are weary of overdevelopment, will pass the pro-development items on to voters. The commission may have a number of options, including making changes to the petition items before approving them or questioning them in court, Reese said. SOLV maintains that people have the right to vote on the items regardless of their perceived effect on the community. "The responsibility falls on the shoulders of the commission," Huhn said. "For them to take some action would prove that they have good faith." Nick Johnson can be reached at nickjohnson@sptimes.com or 893-8361.
[Last modified January 15, 2008, 23:02:11]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Frank
|
01/17/08 10:02 AM
|
|
As soon as the controversy is ripe, the Court should be pleased to step in and run the City.
|
|
by Scott
|
01/17/08 09:11 AM
|
|
The people have a right to vote and have a say in there local goverments. The city seems to think that goverment for the people and by the people is wrong. They think that they shoud decied what is right for the City. I think the City is WRONG!
|
|
by Marty
|
01/16/08 09:04 PM
|
|
Amazing the hotels and tourists were here long before either of you lived in SPB. Why don't you leave. I want the tourists to help keep my taxes down.
|
|
by Beachnative
|
01/16/08 07:22 PM
|
|
Just brilliant, Al,allways thinking of the economy and small business just stand back and let everything waste away take a ride down Corey Ave or the beautiful intersection of 75th ave and Gulf Blvd.Lots to be proud of there?? and it's geetig worse !
|
|
by Al
|
01/16/08 04:34 PM
|
|
If you want to build hotels, put 'em on Clearwater Beach, which is hurting for hotel rooms.
|
|
by Kay
|
01/16/08 10:27 AM
|
|
Aaron, hotels and clubs are an improvement? If I liked South Beach, I wouldn't be here. I love our sleepy beach.
|
|
by Aaron
|
01/16/08 08:29 AM
|
|
St. Pete Beach ha sthe oppurtunity to be something like South Beach if the people will stop complaining. I mean who really comes to St. Pete Beach besides 60 yr old New Yorkers. Time for a change. Build the Hotels and clubs and change will follow
|
|