News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Times poll: Amendment 1 tax cut is no slam dunk
By ALEX LEARY, Times Staff Writer
Published January 26, 2008
|
|
 |
|
[Skip O'Rourke | Times]
|
Gov. Charlie Crist's monopoly on TV advertising and growing fears over the economy could boost passage of Amendment 1 on Tuesday, a St. Petersburg Times poll has found.
But, for now, the property tax cutting measure still falls short of the 60 percent needed to pass -- a bar rarely reached on referendums.
Among Floridians likely to vote in Tuesday's election, 55 percent support the measure and 30 percent oppose. In Tampa Bay, 56 percent of voters approve. Statewide, far more Republicans than Democrats like the plan.
The battle now is for the 14 percent statewide who remain undecided.
Opponents, who have stirred concern over the effect on local government and school budgets, hope they can tap enough of the undecided vote to thwart a win.
Pollster Tom Eldon, however, said he thinks the measure "appears headed to victory," due to Crist's aggressive efforts on TV, radio, mail and phone advertising.
"Basically they have the microphone to themselves," he said of Crist and the "Vote Yes on 1" campaign, which has raised more than $4-million, dwarfing the $1-million raised by the opposition.
"Traditionally in Florida it's been nearly impossible to build a coalition to be against a tax decrease," said fellow pollster Rob Schroth.
Plus, the growing attention to the economy could be a boon for the pro-Amendment 1 forces. Concern over financial matters ranked highest among voters, above the Iraq war, illegal immigration and improving schools and health care.
Read the ballot language and it's clear "it's very pro-homeowner," pollster Kellyanne Conway said. "In this declining economy this signals to people that help is on the way."
But the poll also shows that a higher than expected Democratic turnout for the presidential primary could end up thwarting Amendment 1 supporters, since only 46 percent of Democrats support the measure, while 64 percent of Republicans do.
Democrats were supposed to stay away from the polls because the state was stripped of its delegates after state leaders moved up the primary, violating national party rules. The presidential candidates signed a pledge not to campaign in Florida.
But early voting participation shows strong Democratic interest in an election couched in historic terms. It's likely that either a woman -- Hillary Rodham Clinton -- or an African-American -- Barack Obama -- will get the nomination. Either would be a first for a major party nomination.
The telephone survey of 800 registered voters was conducted Jan. 20-22 for the St. Petersburg Times, Bay News 9 and the Miami Herald.
The poll was done by Schroth, Eldon & Associates, whose clients primarily are Democrats, and the Polling Co., which mainly works with Republicans. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points overall.
Supporters of Amendment 1 were split on why they would vote yes. Some wanted the $240 average tax savings that would occur from increasing the state's homestead exemption from $25,000 to the equivalent of about $40,000.
Another enticement is a provision allowing homeowners to carry their accrued Save Our Homes benefit when they move. The savings could be in the thousands of dollars.
Others feel the package is the best that lawmakers can produce.
"It will give me $250 a year -- that's not a big deal," said Bruce Slack, 82, a Republican from New Port Richey. "But it's better than nothing. It does throw a bone to some of us."
Among those who said they do not support the amendment, 33 percent said it would put too much of a strain on local governments and schools. If enacted, the cuts would be $9.3-billion over five years, with $1.5-billion coming from schools.
Twenty-one percent of voters said they think something better will come from Tallahassee and 18 percent opposed it because it did not lower taxes significantly.
Earl Peck, 79, a Republican in St. Petersburg, wants a do-over. As a longtime homeowner the package favors him should he want to move and carry his Save Our Homes benefit.
But Peck thinks that only exacerbates an inequitable property tax structure.
"They are helping people who need help the least, and that includes me. I'm idealist enough to know that's not a good thing,' Peck said.
"I like Charlie," Peck said of the governor, "but I'm amazed he's putting all his credibility on the line for this."
Indeed, Crist stands virtually alone in trying to pass Amendment 1. Though the measure is a product of the Legislature, Crist was an early backer of increasing the homestead exemption and Save Our Homes portability.
Republican lawmakers have been openly critical of the package despite voting for it and few have shown up at recent events Crist has held around the state.
The public, though, still holds Crist in high regard. Entering his second year in office, he has a 57 percent approval rating, according to the poll. That is down from earlier ratings but Crist remains one of the most popular governors in the United States.
"I'm crazy about Charlie Crist," said Nancy Smith, 64, an independent voter from Lutz. "He's a real down-to-earth person."
Cliff Deardorff, 56 of Wesley Chapel believes Crist's argument that it will stimulate the housing market. "You'll get more people down here to buy all these homes that are vacant."
Floridians are more pessimistic about the direction of the nation than their home state. Sixty-six percent of voters said the United States is on the wrong track. But only 50 percent said Florida is on the wrong track.
The property tax amendment is up slightly from an earlier Times survey. In November, approval was at 53 percent.
The opposition has also gained in that period, from 27 percent in November to 30 percent now. That movement reflects a shrinking number of undecided voters.
Amendment 1
It has four major provisions:
- Increase the exemption for homesteaded homeowners.
- Make tax benefits from Save Our Homes "portable."
- Cap property assessment hikes for nonhomesteaded property at 10 percent annually.
- Create a $25,000 property exemption for some business equipment and mobile home property.
[Last modified January 26, 2008, 01:13:25]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Jim
|
01/31/08 03:13 PM
|
|
I pay 18,000 for taxes and next door neighbor pays 5,000. Same size house but mine is was built in 2004.
Tax apprasier told me to plan on 8,000 or 9,000 when I inquired prior to building my home. How about a roll back to what the tax should.
|
|
by Rose
|
01/29/08 09:34 AM
|
|
More voodoo economics. If they stop the obscene corporate crony giveaways, they could lower rates for citizens. Real education and living wages cost less that prison cells. Vote no - until these hustlers show common sense.
|
|
by Annie
|
01/28/08 10:31 PM
|
|
What bothers me most is that Charlie Christ promised insurance and property tax relief, and we aren't getting either one yet! Wake up folks, this 'essentially' isn't what we were promised. Oh, yeah, campaign promise huh?
|
|
by Steve
|
01/28/08 11:53 AM
|
|
Great! I will save $250 and lose my job. Thanks for Nothing Charlie Crist
|
|
by david
|
01/28/08 08:33 AM
|
|
vote no ,it will not help the working class ,we will continue to carry the load,we did not get a pay raise but all we buy went up!
|
|
by Terrance
|
01/27/08 08:22 PM
|
|
Should amendment 1 not pass will the state be forced to come up with a new proposal,or just let it die?
|
|
by LORETTA
|
01/26/08 07:52 PM
|
|
NO.
|
|
by matt
|
01/26/08 06:34 PM
|
|
PASS IT, then work for a better plan, check out htttp://cutpropertytaxesnow.com they have a good plan.
|
|
by JT
|
01/26/08 04:54 PM
|
|
Folks if you don't vote to cut your taxes why should politicians. After passing this and helping property owners out then we can keep pushing for more!!!
|
|
by Anna
|
01/26/08 03:37 PM
|
|
This amendment looks like it will pass according to the mentioned poll. If you take out the undecideds, it passes with near 64% YES vote. If undecideds vote 50-50, it still passes according to the poll.
|
|
by Incredulous
|
01/26/08 02:43 PM
|
|
Exactly..
It only exacerbates an inequitable property tax structure.
It is not good for Florida in the long run.
|
|
by Gil
|
01/26/08 01:39 PM
|
|
This Amendment is a disgrace. If (God forbid) it passes, then the public will get just what it deserves--$4.60 a week reduction in property tax and an alternative tax to make up for the lost revenue. Crist has lost my support.
Vote NO.
|
|
by Dr_Dug
|
01/26/08 11:21 AM
|
|
This idea will never work. Whats next..a bandaid? It's a worry that people will vote for it NOT knowing the full effects down the road. People will recieve a token check from Ol' Charlie then have to deal with the MESS when he's gone! YOU BEEN TOLD!
|
|
by dave
|
01/26/08 10:58 AM
|
|
What the clueless government needs to do is roll the property tax levels back to 2001, eliminate the save our homes for everyone except seniors. And everyone then pays the same rate regardless if they do this you will see florida grow and prosper
|
|
by Mike
|
01/26/08 10:57 AM
|
|
This is a vote about the politicians in Tallahassee. If you think they kept their promises on taxes and insurance, vote Yes. If you want to send a message that they haven't lived up to their promises, vote No. Don't just sit home. Go out and vote NO.
|
|
by dave
|
01/26/08 10:55 AM
|
|
If you think the FLA economy is bad now just wait until this government runs all the snowbirds AND the Billions of tax dollars they generate with them.
|
|
by dave
|
01/26/08 10:48 AM
|
|
Already property values are falling and the sub prime mess is not he only reason a glut of homes for sale is the biggest reason for the drop in prices, And guess what when you can't sell a house you don't build them.
|
|
by dave
|
01/26/08 10:43 AM
|
|
OK Floridians, How about this; A lifelong Florida resident has been renting, Finally he can afford to buy, but when he does he finds out his property taxes are going to be 5700/year, while the owner of an identical house pays 2300/yr is this right?
|
|
by Kyle
|
01/26/08 08:37 AM
|
|
I think that Amendment 1 would help the people who really need it, young, first-time home owners. I bought my first house 3 years ago - the cost has been a struggle. Without portability, I'm wondering how I will ever be able to buy a bigger house.
|
|
by John Schmidt
|
01/26/08 08:15 AM
|
|
Vote NO! If you can't afford to purchase a house and afford the all the expenses and maintainence costs related to it including the tax bill, you shouldn't purchase it. DUH!
|
|
by Dave
|
01/26/08 07:48 AM
|
|
I'm voting no. Taking more money away from our underfunded schools is not worth the measly $20 a month I'll be saving. Governor Crist seems like a nice fellow but $240 tax savings a year is nothing.
|
|
by JR
|
01/26/08 07:43 AM
|
|
If the undecideds split at the same 55/30 ratio as people who have already decided, then it'll pass around 63-64%.
|