News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Perspective
Slinging slime is what Clintons do best
By PHILIP GAILEY
Published January 27, 2008
Bill Clinton is all over the place, like a mad dog's slobber.
On the campaign trail as his wife's chief surrogate, he is losing his temper, snapping at reporters, mangling the truth, distorting the record including his own and acting more like a political hatchet man than a former president. He warns that voting for Barack Obama would be a "roll of the dice." Obama's record as a consistent opponent of the Iraq war is a "fairy tale." Last week in South Carolina, Clinton accused Obama of doing a "hit job" on him, but refused to back up the charge. He has injected race into the campaign by defining Obama as just another black candidate who can't go all the way.
Compared to the dirty work being handled by other surrogates and anonymous character assassins, Bill Clinton is taking the high road. Even so, some leading Democrats fear he is damaging the party. Sen. Edward Kennedy and Rep. Rahm Emanuel, who are neutral in the race, asked the former president to stop sliming and slamming Obama, according to Newsweek. He is not about to back off. If the price of taking down Obama is to tarnish his post-White House image as a global statesman, Clinton doesn't mind paying it. The Big Dog is having too much fun doing what he does best, which is being unpresidential.
Narcissist that he is, Bill Clinton can't pass up an opportunity to remind voters of the glory years of his presidency, years Hillary promises to restore without all the scandals and embarrassments. Great was his unfaithfulness, and he owes her big-time. Maybe he figures getting her into the Oval Office he occupied for eight years will settle that debt. But as always, it's also about him. If Hillary Clinton is about to make history, he intends to play a starring role in his wife's campaign - and almost certainly in her presidency.
In Clinton-think, it's bad enough that Barack Obama didn't defer to Hillary this time and wait his turn. But the nerve of this guy trying to become the nation's first president who happens to be black. Hasn't anyone told Obama that Toni Morrison called Bill Clinton the nation's "first black president" a decade ago?
Politics is a game of hard knocks, some below the belt, and it is not for the faint-hearted. And no one plays political hardball as aggressively as the Clintons. They are ruthless when it comes to smashing their opponents or anyone else who threatens their political ambitions. What they are doing to Barack Obama is not all that different from what they did to the women who outed Clinton as a serial adulterer as governor of Arkansas and as president.
When it comes to the politics of personal destruction, the Clintons know how to get the job done while appearing to be above the ugliness of it all. Defamation is their weapon of choice.
In Iowa, an e-mail was bouncing around the state planting suspicion that Obama was a Muslim who had been trained in radical Islam in an Indonesian madrassa. This slander was traced by to some Clinton campaign volunteers, who were asked to resign. The candidate said there was no place in her campaign for such smears.
Then Bill Shaheen, co-chairman of Clinton's campaign in New Hampshire, told reporters of his concern that if Obama, who has admitted using illegal drugs as a teenager, were to win the nomination, some voters might wonder if he also may have been a dope peddler. When Obama cried foul, Shaheen apologized and resigned from his campaign post. Hillary Clinton apologized to Obama for Shaheen's smear. The apologies and resignation kept the story alive by repeating the original defamation.
Before the Clintons are through with Obama, he will be stumbling around punch-drunk from all the jabs, kicks, slaps and punches the Clintons are throwing at him. They make outrageously false claims about his record and distort his words. And when he fights back, Hillary asks, whatever happened to Obama's promise to lift politics to higher ground?
Nicholas von Hoffman, a New York Observer columnist, wrote last week: "The heart of the Clintons' strategy is to pull Obama down to their level . . . The Clintons cannot compete with the enthusiasm Obama sets off so they must destroy it. Their tactic is disillusionment. They are the quashers of the dream. Bring Obama's people down by showing them he is just another pol like themselves."
The Clintons don't seem to care if black voters are offended by the way they have been roughing up Obama. Like the Democratic Party, they take black votes for granted in the general election. And besides, maybe after Hillary wins the nomination with the support of Hispanics, now the nation's largest minority, black voters will take note and wonder if Hillary Clinton will be known as the nation's "first Hispanic president."
Philip Gailey's e-mail address isgailey@sptimes.com.
[Last modified January 27, 2008, 20:56:58]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by jeanie
|
03/01/08 10:16 PM
|
|
I say it's time we demand honor of our leaders. The Clintons have shown themselves to be dishonorable people Need I say more.
|
|
by tammy
|
02/13/08 05:36 PM
|
|
The author seems to pull the black card when it benefits him. What will guarentee that Obama doesn't turn the tables as president and give all the benefits to people of color, discriminating against whites? Only Obama supporters meantioned color. hum
|
|
by George
|
02/06/08 07:04 PM
|
|
Baloney
|
|
by Steve
|
01/30/08 12:13 PM
|
|
"When it comes to the politics of personal destruction, the Clintons know how to get the job done while appearing to be above the ugliness of it all. Defamation is their weapon of choice."
Genetics or environment?
|
|
by Bob
|
01/30/08 11:27 AM
|
|
Gailey you sound more like a frothing dog than the Clintons. Do we ignore the house bought by Obama (bargain) from his Syrian benefactor and the follow on lot deal to extend the property. Offend black voters? Anyone remember Marion Barry's record?
|
|
by Dr_Dug
|
01/30/08 09:27 AM
|
|
Black Voters? I thought it wasn't about race? I thought it wasn't about color? Once again...say one thing....mean another. Blacks always vote for themselves...Its always about COLOR!! Thats why we have lines..they draw them too !!!
|
|
by Joyce
|
01/30/08 08:49 AM
|
|
The auto generated text that is displayed after I submit comments suggests you'll display thoughtful comments. Well you don't - You only display those that support your writings. So much for generating thought and understanding.
|
|
by Joyce
|
01/30/08 08:47 AM
|
|
Why do you only post comments by those that agree with you? You hide behind your "Story comments and articles submitted to itsyourtimes.com are reviewed by an editor before publication." But it's still censorship. This was still a hateful piece.
|
|
by Eileen
|
01/30/08 08:19 AM
|
|
Right on! I couldn't have said it better myself.
|
|
by Annette
|
01/30/08 08:05 AM
|
|
Come on,the Democrats have always been nasty. Now it's a toss up between the Witch and the Wanna-be.Clinton in office again? Oh God help us all.
|
|
by Donald
|
01/30/08 07:43 AM
|
|
Oh come on, give us a break here!
The Republican Party is the all time American political mudsling champs. Reference Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, Nixon's Dirty Tricks, the Swiftboating of Kerry. It's been a daily diet of mud for Hilary and Bill
|
|
by Tom
|
01/30/08 07:26 AM
|
|
The only place you will ever find a politican who doesn't sling mud, lie, cheat or steal is on the unemployment line. They are all crooks.
|
|
by Carol
|
01/30/08 06:41 AM
|
|
A politician is a politician. They all say glowing things during their campaign, then when they are elected, EVERYTHING changes. Look at Charlie Crist. He is proof beyond a reasonable doubt they change once elected.
|
|
by david
|
01/30/08 06:22 AM
|
|
The billary2 will stop at nothing to get Bill back in the House-but Hillary can not make it! She divides & conquer-USA need inclusions-not separation. Loser the Billary 2 are
|
|
by Jay
|
01/30/08 04:42 AM
|
|
Worst article i ever read in my life LETS LOOK AT THE REAL ISSUE THE COUNTRY WAS RAN A LOT BETTER UNDER THE CLINTONS THATS THE BOTTOM LINE!
|
|
by Kyle
|
01/28/08 09:00 PM
|
|
The reason that Bill Clinton was popular is because Allen Greenspan did a terrific job while he was president. Clinton left us with a stretching Tech bubble and his failure to take action on Bin Laden when we had him in our crosshairs cost us deeply
|
|
by Rudi
|
01/28/08 05:33 PM
|
|
The only thing more scary than Hillary in the White House is Jeb or any other Bush...well, come to think of it, any Republican.
|
|
by Lady
|
01/28/08 04:58 PM
|
|
We cant afford Clinton again, and something about Obama makes me very uneasy. I am a republican, and less than thrilled with anyone on either ticket, but Mc Cain/Huckabee look the best so far.
|
|
by Jim
|
01/28/08 04:33 PM
|
|
A vote for Hillary for the Dem. nomination means another 4 years of a Repub. president. Obama is the only path to real change in this country. The GOP still on the war march and Hillary just spins the Bush,Clinton,Bush,Clinton merry-go-round.
|
|
by P.L.
|
01/28/08 02:15 PM
|
|
All the registered demos (who plan to vote republican) are voting for Hillary now (so Obama doesn't win) and will
vote for Romney in the general election.
|
|
by DE
|
01/28/08 02:02 PM
|
|
Oh come on! After the hatchet job by the Republicans when he was in office that we the tax payers had to foot the bill for, this is nothing!
|
|
by Ralph
|
01/28/08 01:42 PM
|
|
She calls for a change. But she is part of what we need a change from. We don't need 4 more years of a Clinton in the White House.
|
|
by Ray Allen
|
01/28/08 01:37 PM
|
|
if Bill is "mad dog Slobber", what would Karl Rove's tatics in election 2000 be considered against John Mccain and 2004 John Kerry? is Nicholas von Hoffman one of your buddies? he is in Murdoch's crib and it sounds like you are too.
|
|
by Ray Allen
|
01/28/08 01:29 PM
|
|
do you really enjoy pissing people off?
|
|
by Teri
|
01/28/08 01:23 PM
|
|
The fact you are misquoting Bill Clinton, in fact, proves the writer of this article is the real liar.
|
|
by Steve
|
01/28/08 12:46 PM
|
|
Article is dead on correct. Look at the Obama supporters - the young, the educated, the open minded, the hopeful. Its sad its not 100%.
|
|
by JIm
|
01/28/08 12:36 PM
|
|
This name-calling "article" is absent any facts or thoughtful assessment. But it's another hit piece on the Clintons so lets ignore reality and bash Clinton
|
|
by Tony
|
01/28/08 12:29 PM
|
|
yeah, we would never want a Clinton in the White House again. They might do something crazy like fix the economy and eliminate the deficit...AGAIN
|
|
by Rita
|
01/28/08 12:01 PM
|
|
Now , that being said ,how about some negative comments that Obama has been saying about Hillary ? Let's keep it fair.
|
|
by John
|
01/28/08 11:36 AM
|
|
Anything other that the same old stuff the Clintons have been slinging around can't be half bad. They are the epitome of what's wrong with our government today. We need honesty and hope...and they bring neither to the table!
|
|
by Ryan
|
01/28/08 11:10 AM
|
|
Wow, no suprise who the author of this article is supporting.
|
|
by Leslie
|
01/28/08 10:45 AM
|
|
Finally! The Times speaks the truth about the Clintons! The fact that the Democratic National Party even considers Hillary as a viable Presidential candidate with Bill by her side is an incredible affront to all U.S. citizens with any character.
|
|
by peter
|
01/28/08 10:43 AM
|
|
This was definitly a hatchman's job,not the kind of story i would expect from someone who understands what the party nomination as a standard bearer would mean for a candidate in an election where the incumbent is not a candidate.step up.
|
|
by ron
|
01/28/08 09:57 AM
|
|
I agree but I wish this would get out in the public more
|
|
by Phil
|
01/28/08 09:39 AM
|
|
I have been voting for fifty years and have considered it a privilage.after all of the negative campainig this year I don't know if I want to vote or not.I think that Bill Clinton and Hilary are way out of line,bordering on the line of disgusting.
|