Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Borrow pit foes say they're not being heard at hearings
Work could bring 100 trucks to residential streets daily.
By RODNEY THRASH, Times Staff Writer
Published February 1, 2008
KEYSTONE Opponents of a proposed borrow pit in northwest Hillsborough want a third hearing on the matter after the second one went the way of the first. "I ask that you remand the matter back to staff for rescheduling ...," said Barbara Dowling, recording secretary of the Keystone Civic Association. After the initial, four-hour hearing on Nov. 16, opponents said they didn't have enough time to present their arguments because county officials spent much of the hearing addressing last-minute revisions to the application. On Dec. 11, hearing officer Harold Youmans agreed and, in a seven-page ruling, asked the staff to schedule another hearing. "Recommended conditions ... will be complete and distributed so as to allow at least six calendar days for analysis and review by any of the participants, including any opposition," Youmans wrote. Instead, representatives for applicant Stephen Dibbs again submitted revisions to the application just hours before the second hearing on Jan. 25, which was two hours longer than the first. "I feel I wasted four hours on the 16th," said Jerry Rosen a member of the Lutz-Lake Fern Community Coalition steering committee. "I did not want to waste another four hours, which I feel I have. I'm outraged at this." Denise Layne, land use liaison for the Lutz Civic Association, said she is more than outraged. "How much more absurd can this process get?" she asked. "We're all going across the street," she said, a reference to a potential suit against the county. If Dibbs' application is approved, he would be allowed to dig 2.5-million cubic yards of dirt for road and construction projects from 50 acres of Lutz-Lake Fern Road over a 10-year period. The excavation has the potential to bring up to 100 trucks per day through residential streets. Rodney Thrash can be reached at 813 269-5303 or rthrash@sptimes.com.
[Last modified January 31, 2008, 08:34:54]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Mac
|
02/13/08 09:30 AM
|
|
Floridians Unite! We have the same borrow pit problem in Northwest Fl. 1. What is difference between borrow pit & mine? Pits regulated local, mines regulated State & Feds. Define the hole as mine and stop em!
|
|
by Rich
|
02/02/08 09:08 AM
|
|
In the start of the process the county allows the regulations that set how the information comes in and is handled to be ignored by developers. Clear Guidlines and time frames are set out in county rules. We need only use them but so often we do not.
|
|
by Burt
|
02/01/08 08:18 AM
|
|
YOUMANS - He's paid $75 per hour, isn't elected, and the BOCC uses him as their very willing tool to curry favor for developers. He strings out long meeting$ for the benefit of his pur$e, makes ridiculous judgments clearly beyond his charge. CORRUPT!
|
|
by FL Cracker
|
02/01/08 06:15 AM
|
|
as i was saying - negatively effect areas for 10-20 YEARS!Borrow pit apps.should be decided by the entire Board of County Commishioners. But they have put it off on the LUHO-don't want the flack from the public? THIS WHOLE PROCESS IS FATALLY FLAWED!!
|
|
by FL Cracker
|
02/01/08 06:11 AM
|
|
More - Youmans, and the other Land Use Hearing Officer(s)(LUHO) are paid a BIG hourly wage, so no wonder he drags out the hearings - milking the clock? plus - why should a LUHO who is not elected decide these HUGE pits which negatively effect areas..
|
|