News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Deputies want court to decide issue
The union wants the county to settle a contract impasse; the sheriff disagrees.
By MOLLY MOORHEAD, Times Staff Writer
Published February 7, 2008
NEW PORT RICHEY - The Pasco sheriff's deputies union hopes to set legal precedent in a lawsuit filed Wednesday against Sheriff Bob White and the County Commission.
The petition seeks to answer an open question in Florida: Who has the final say in an impasse between labor unions and management?
In this case, the Fraternal Order of Police says it should be the Pasco County Commission.
The Sheriff's Office says it should be the sheriff.
White and the union have been unable to agree on a labor contract since deputies voted to unionize in 2006. Two issues remain in dispute.
Deputies want the Sheriff's Office to provide gap insurance to cover their health care between retirement and when Medicare kicks in.
Also at issue is the agency's discipline process. The union favors more rights to appeal; White wants to retain discipline powers.
A third issue - the use of agency mailboxes and e-mail for distributing union literature - was settled by a state board in favor of White, who banned such uses.
Stuart Rosenfeldt, attorney for the Fraternal Order of Police, said the issues that remain unresolved are clearly under the purview of county commissioners. Gap insurance is a money matter and the commission must approve the sheriff's budget. And discipline is addressed in a county ordinance, which only the commission has the power to amend.
"The two things we want, the sheriff can't give us," Rosenfeldt said.
Further, he said, for White to have the final say is like "being your own appellate court of your own decision."
But Wayne Helsby, attorney for the sheriff, said that's the standard with any public employees union.
He said the Sheriff's Office will "absolutely" oppose the union's petition, which will likely go to a hearing before a circuit judge, and maintain that the sheriff should be the last legislative stop. "He's the one that is the constitutional officer elected by the people," Helsby said. "He's the one that controls the Sheriff's Office and makes decisions on things that are negotiated."
Helsby said the matter, which could affect deputies unions statewide, could soon be resolved by the Legislature. He knows of two proposed bills:
One deems the sheriff the ultimate authority. The other gives that role to the County Commission.
Molly Moorhead can be reached at moorhead@sptimes.com or 727 869-6245.
[Last modified February 6, 2008, 22:43:20]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by bird
|
02/07/08 08:19 PM
|
|
The county commission has to come up with the money (from us) to fund the sheriff's department so they should rule on the health care. The other matters are of a disciplinary nature and should fall in the management category meaning the sheriff.
|
|
by Terri
|
02/07/08 11:32 AM
|
|
It amazes me that White opposes things that he as a former deputy would have requested. Lets all work together for the benefit of all. White can't have it always his way. If he gets benefits, then the deputies should get the same.
|
|
by Tony
|
02/07/08 09:56 AM
|
|
If the deputies want a new sheriff, they should start looking for new jobs. If the people want a new sheriff, they need to vote him out. John - GM does have the final say in it's contract negotiations. Stop the crying.
|
|
by SteveS
|
02/07/08 09:20 AM
|
|
The only true and fair way to settle labor issues is by binding arbitration which is heard by a neutral third party supplied by the Federal Mediation and Concilitory Service. Both sides would have to live with rulings.
|
|
by Harold
|
02/07/08 06:52 AM
|
|
The people elected the sheriff to run law enforcement, not the union. It seems absurd to me that the union would attempt to usurp the authority of an duly elected official.
|
|
by lori
|
02/07/08 06:23 AM
|
|
WHY SHOULD SHERIFF WHITE GIVE DEPUTIES THE SAME BENEFIT ALL THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES AND WHITE HIMSELF HAS. OR A FAIR HEARING BOARD SO HE CAN'T STILL CONTROL WHO IS EMPLOYEED ASK PASCO DEPUTIES. THEY WANT A NEW SHERIFF THEY ARE FED UP!!!
|
|
by sam
|
02/07/08 06:15 AM
|
|
im wonderin why is this even a question, is it becuse of money ,,,and who will have to pay,,, thats all this county is about is money there spending and gettin millons and they still are not satisfied,,thats our commish,,,greedy and lousy,
|
|
by john
|
02/07/08 05:47 AM
|
|
Should be County Commission, not the sheriff, Should not be one person.
That would be like giving GM the final say in contract negotiations.
|