News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Todays Letters: We need a party for independents
Letters to the Editor
Published February 8, 2008
Jan. 31, commentary by Bob Graham
This article by former Florida Sen. Bob Graham is an excellent attempt at reforming the ultrapartisan struggle into which our two-party system has fallen. Perhaps the current presidential election will lead to some of his reforms, but I wouldn't count on it.
What America really needs is a viable third party. We've had examples of it in the past with Ross Perot or Ralph Nader. But little of it continued to survive after the elections, except in small enclaves.
Today, however, there are a huge number of registered independent voters who belong to neither party. Why not form an "Independent Party"? This is easier said than done, of course, but beginning at the local or even the state level, there should be enough capable and ambitious young people - perhaps even among the ruling parties - to form such a new party based on the neutral, independent vote. With any success, this could be transferred to the national level, especially in the congressional races.
W.H. Riddell, Tampa
We might have mattered
Florida's Republican-majority Legislature, with bipartisan support, passed a bill moving Florida's 2008 presidential primary to Jan. 29. Florida's Republican governor signed the bill into law. The idea was to give Florida an earlier voice in deciding who would be the nominees for the two major political parties, rather than leaving that honor to Iowa and New Hampshire and other small states.
As it turns out, Florida's 2008 primary will be mostly remembered for the implosion of the Rudy Giuliani campaign and, to a lesser degree, the end of the John Edwards campaign. Rather than being a "kingmaker," Florida was just another early state whose primary results ended up making little difference in picking the parties' nominees.
So, Jan. 29, 2008 is history, as is this week's Super Tuesday, and there's still no Democratic or Republican presidential candidate with enough delegate votes to secure the nomination.
Which brings us to the Law of Unintended Consequences. If Florida's primary was coming up in March, the nation's eyes would be focused on Florida (and Texas, a week earlier) as the real tipping point for the nominees, the "kingmaker." Instead, Florida is just an also-ran.
Hans Meyer, Tallahassee
First fix Florida, governor
I wish Gov. Charlie Crist would stop running for vice president and do something about Florida's insurance and taxes. Spending $4-million to prove to the party hacks that he can deliver Florida is pitiful. So is the $240 property tax reduction.
If Crist wants to use Florida as a stepping-stone to the White House, he should make sure the state is a firm rock he can stand on before he leaps.
Madeline Ziegele, Hudson
A better way to vote
I'm tired of the lousy candidates, corporate welfare, greed and corruption in the system. Each election cycle seems worse than the last. Our unfair voting system favors two parties and discourages good candidates and third parties.
Instant runoff voting needs no expensive runoffs and lets you rank candidates, one, two, three. If your first choice loses, your vote automatically goes to your second choice, etc. No spoilers, splitters or wasted votes. No calculating the lesser of two evils. Many cities, states and countries already use this better system.
Instant runoff voting encourages voter interest and participation, and better candidates. I look for a linchpin cause that may indirectly solve many problems. Is encouraging more candidates and more voter participation the linchpin? I think so.
William Gilbert, Weeki Wachee
Report says nation at greater risk Feb. 1
Pathetic priorities
I'd like to see a political cartoon that would look something like this: On a map of America, cities are being blown up in the distance; men and women in uniform are out to the side standing beside broken-down equipment, helmets in hand, tears in their eyes and drooping shoulders; and in the foreground, the Capitol building in Washington, surrounded by throngs of Americans with their hands stretched out and Uncle Sam standing atop the building throwing tons of money out to them under the banner "Economic Stimulus Package."
It certainly would show what our priorities are and the profound intelligence of our national leaders. How pathetic.
Sandra Tracey, Tarpon Springs
Bush policy on torture is morally absurd Feb. 6, commentary by Tim Rutten
Unbalanced rant
It is Tim Rutten of the Los Angeles Times who is morally absurd by asserting that the CIA waterboarding of three known al-Qaida terrorists just days after 9/11 is indefensible.
The object was to find out if more American citizens were slated to be blown up in the ensuing days. He conveniently omits this in his unbalanced rant. Printing dishonest pap like this does not serve our community well.
Vincent Probst, Tampa
[Last modified February 7, 2008, 22:10:36]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Minerva
|
02/09/08 01:56 AM
|
|
I, too,want an open primary but it needs amending state law that forbids it (can't amend state constitution if there is statute on a subject). We also need a 3rd party for moderates, not simply an 'independent' party. Please - in my lifetime!
|
|
by Larry
|
02/08/08 08:13 PM
|
|
By making a collective decision on how to spend our rebates, we retake the power of the people that we've given away, we take a big whack at several major problems and regain the confidence we need to continue forward movement as a country.
|
|
by Larry
|
02/08/08 08:07 PM
|
|
By collectively buying American products and services proven to increase the energy efficiency of our homes and vehicles, we get immediate individual returns, we stimulate the AMERICAN economy, we lower our nat. carbon emissions all simultaneously.
|
|
by Dee
|
02/08/08 12:58 PM
|
|
What we need in Florida is an OPEN Primary. That way, ALL who desire to vote can cast their vote
|
|
by JT
|
02/08/08 09:06 AM
|
|
Just what would an independent party represent? Would it simply be a vote against the other two? Would it reflect some 3rd unknown philosophy? What kind of platform? Pro-life even years and Pro-choice odd years, cut your taxes if you pay none etc.
|
|
by Issywise
|
02/08/08 07:08 AM
|
|
A party for independents--then they'd not be independent, would they? Why not do what the founders intended and eschew political parties altogether? Do they really provide "political stability?" or do they trump independent consideration of issues?
|
|
by kevin
|
02/08/08 05:47 AM
|
|
I stroll around my community last night and found some interesting things. Pinellas Park Police, Tampa Police, Clearwater Police Cars and a Clearwater Fire Chief SUV. Seems a waste of tax money, but of course they can respond to emergencies efficient
|