News |
Rays
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Rays willing to put $150M up front
The team would get a private loan to advance its stadium plans.
By Aaron, Sharockman, Times Staff Writer
Published February 20, 2008
ST. PETERSBURG - The Tampa Bay Rays are willing to contribute their $150-million share for a proposed downtown ballpark in a lump sum instead of yearly rent payments, team executives said Tuesday.
The money would come from a private team loan, Rays senior vice president of development Michael Kalt said. The Rays previously had planned to pay the city $10-million a year in rent payments to cover a third of the $450-million stadium cost.
Changes in Major League Baseball revenue and accounting rules allowed the Rays to reconsider how they paid their part of ballpark construction.
Practically, Kalt said, the switch makes no difference to the team's proposal, which when coupled with the proposed redevelopment of Tropicana Field tops $1-billion.
But critics had called into question the idea of rent payments, saying the city could be left responsible if something went wrong. If that happened, they said, the city also would be on the hook for a new loan.
With the Rays borrowing the money up front, that concern is virtually eliminated.
"It's easier for us to put up the dollars up front," Kalt acknowledged Tuesday. "But really, it makes absolutely no difference."
The Rays' contribution is only one piece of a $450-million financial puzzle that has yet to become clear.
Team officials admitted Tuesday they still had more questions than answers.
In January, the team abandoned possible state funding for the project. Now the team appears ready to rely solely on the successful redevelopment of Tropicana Field to make up the difference.
The team is hoping to collect as much as $300-million through the sale of the 86-acre property along with the city and county property taxes generated on the site.
Team president Matt Silverman said the Rays will not know if the sale of Tropicana Field can create the money needed for a new ballpark before March 18, when developers' offers for the site are opened by the city.
The Rays, who are working with developer Hines Interests of Houston on a proposal, say they believe the financing will work. But they won't be able to prove it until perhaps summer.
The City Council is expected to vote whether to schedule a referendum on the stadium proposal in June. The Rays said they hope to have a definitive financial program in place before then.
"People want validation," Silverman said. "But it's still very early in the game."
Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com or 727 892-2273.
[Last modified February 20, 2008, 07:26:47]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Fact Checker
|
02/27/08 02:53 PM
|
|
Paul - Please get your facts right. 1. The stadium will have a retractable roof. 2. The Rays are building additional parking. 3. A 34,000 seat stadium does not equal 20,000 cars, its closer to 12,000. Think of all the extra tourist $$ this will bring
|
|
by Justin
|
02/22/08 12:20 PM
|
|
I doubt the Times will post this but I want everyone to know that the Rays are paying people to come into these forums and post pro-stadium comments. They are also fund the new "citizens group" fansforwaterfrontstadium, although indirectly of course
|
|
by Mandy
|
02/22/08 09:06 AM
|
|
Ken, Al Lang field doesn't congest our streets with tens of thousands 80 days a year (the majority of whom come for the game, spend all their money there, and then go home). And when did the plan change so that no filling of the bay is required?
|
|
by Justin
|
02/22/08 09:03 AM
|
|
Develop part of the land around the Trop then if you want more revenue for the city. The Rays would not be "creating" revenue, the city would be creating it since it's OUR land. Time and again studies show sports team have no $ benefit 4 cities
|
|
by John
|
02/22/08 12:40 AM
|
|
How can the Rays claim any portion of the $300 mil for the property they rent for one dollar a year. Remember how much we paid to clean up the old site to build a vacnat stadium? Now move a $ looser to the H2O front?
|
|
by Ken
|
02/21/08 09:35 AM
|
|
Mandy--there has been a stadium on your precious waterfront for about 80 years. The Rays just want to put a newer, nicer one there (and add park land and other amentities that will not otherwise exist). And it will NOT require filling in the bay.
|
|
by Danny
|
02/20/08 10:29 PM
|
|
You all are complaining about how traffic will be horrible if they build a stadium there. I dont think you all were complaining when Al Lang Field really was being used for other teams or even spring training. I think you dont want to support them.
|
|
by Progress
|
02/20/08 08:38 PM
|
|
Justin, currently, we get NO revenue from the Trop site. Is that what you prefer? The new stadium and redevelopment of the Trop site CREATES revenue for the city. I say that if the Rays CREATE revenue, they should get SOME of it TEMPORARILY.
|
|
by Justin
|
02/20/08 07:06 PM
|
|
Jon, this stadium is not privately funded AT ALL. The city will sell off OUR PUBLIC land. The private loan will only be so the Rays can pay their rent up front, but they'd have to pay that anyway so it's really no contribution whatsoever. Think!
|
|
by Paul
|
02/20/08 05:28 PM
|
|
Lot so small, bay gets filled in to make space. Roof not present to shade sun or certain rains, 300ft ugly pole stuck in ground. 20,000 or more cars and no parking garages planned, priceless. Thanks for nothing Council and Rays' owners.
|
|
by 9th St. Johnny
|
02/20/08 04:44 PM
|
|
Hey, I got an idea. How bout ownership put up all $450 million, and then pay the property and income taxes like us unwashed common folk. Can't wait to vote!
|
|
by Jon
|
02/20/08 04:30 PM
|
|
Traffic? 2nd street is 4 lanes wide already there. 4 lanes > 2 lanes of all the avenues and streets leading to the Trop. Taxes? Nothing to do with it, this project is all privately funded or a redistribution of current loans. Quit your complaining.
|
|
by Mark
|
02/20/08 01:27 PM
|
|
Remember the Glazers were going to pay for half the cost of the new stadium? I'm sure the Rays would honor their commitment like the Glazers have.
|
|
by Mandy
|
02/20/08 11:18 AM
|
|
I don't care if they pay all of it! I DO NOT WANT that huge stadium right on our precious waterfront. Fools gold for us, real gold for them!
|
|
by Pat
|
02/20/08 11:14 AM
|
|
I agree Tony. We have been so disillusioned by our past owner, that we are afraid to trust our present ownership to do right by the team and the city and the fans!
|
|
by Jan
|
02/20/08 10:53 AM
|
|
$150M? Big deal. That still leaves $300M for taxpayers to pony up. The Rays are disingenuous to say "no taxpayer funding" will be used. What about the public LAND they're usurping? If this deal made economic sense they'd be paying for it themselves.
|
|
by Nate
|
02/20/08 10:29 AM
|
|
Build this stadium!!!
|
|
by Adam
|
02/20/08 09:46 AM
|
|
I think this proposed stadium is the kiss of death for the Rays. Traffic would be horrible in that location, and watching a game in the summer heat and humidity of florida outdoors would make an otherwise fun experience miserable.
|
|
by Claudel
|
02/20/08 09:38 AM
|
|
Does this mean the Rays are paying for this new stadium on there own and that the city/county just have to approve it?
|
|
by NR
|
02/20/08 08:56 AM
|
|
If they are putting a 1/3 in upfront and the rest is pending the re-development plans... it would seem that the city and tax payers win. (i.e. no increase in taxes to fund the project) Granted the timing of the whole thing is key.
|
|
by Tony
|
02/20/08 08:22 AM
|
|
If anything the Rays ownership group seem to be very savvy businessmen. Let them do their thing an see where it leads.
|