St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Schools

School dispute simmers at top

The Pinellas district's top two people are locked in a nasty feud.

By Thomas C. Tobin, Times Staff Writer
Published February 22, 2008


ADVERTISEMENT

School Board attorney Jim Robinson shared the e-mail with School Board members.

Superintendent Clayton Wilcox was hired in 2004.

For more than a year behind the scenes, the top two employees in the Pinellas school system have been at odds, their ability to work together hampered.

Now, the relationship between superintendent Clayton Wilcox and School Board attorney Jim Robinson is so poisonous that Robinson has asked the board to intervene. He has proposed that the board hire a facilitator to help repair the damage.

Board members will deal with the conflict at a workshop Monday. But most say they have doubts about hiring a facilitator and none of them were happy about mediating a nasty dispute between two well-paid employees.

"They need to work together, and they need to figure out a way," board member Carol Cook said. "Grow up. I wouldn't accept this from my children."

Chairwoman Nancy Bostock said the board should discuss "whether we have the right people in these positions."

She added: "This is not the first chapter in this saga, but I think it might be in the school district's best interests to have this be the last chapter."

In a private corporation, several said, the two men would be told to work it out.

"And if you don't work it out, then someone chooses to move on," board member Jane Gallucci said. "They're big boys. They're intelligent boys. They can work it out."

E-mails show new low

The ongoing conflict hit a new low in recent days when Wilcox and Robinson traded e-mails over the issue of how principals should react to arrests and law enforcement investigations on public school campuses.

Robinson expressed dismay that the superintendent did not consult him on the issue. Wilcox responded with an e-mail that said, in part: "Jim ... I lack any confidence in you and your ability to give me advice that is competent."

He went on to criticize Robinson as inconsistent and self-promoting and said he wished the board had fired Robinson in the fall when his contract came up for renewal. He said he planned to work mainly with two other attorneys on the district staff and seek Robinson's advice only in "limited circumstances." He said he would "work professionally" with Robinson in instances when contact could not be avoided.

Robinson shared the e-mail with School Board members, saying, "the personal attack he launches against me is of no consequence." But he argued that the superintendent cannot go around him because the board has hired him to be its attorney as well as the district's general counsel.

"Dr. Wilcox's failure to cooperate in good faith materially and wrongfully interferes with my ability to fulfill my duties and responsibilities," Robinson wrote.

In interviews, both men acknowledged that their troubles span many months and involve a number of issues affecting the district.

"I feel embarrassed that something like this found its way into the public spotlight," Wilcox said.

He criticized Robinson for involving board members, thus making the dispute public.

"I'm a strong-willed person," Wilcox said. "And I've worked through some very difficult situations in my career. But I've never had somebody who intentionally chose to take the conversation out of our hands and put it into someone else's."

Robinson argued that the superintendent's unwillingness to work with him constituted a "fundamental breakdown" between the two men that the board needed to know about.

"His e-mail very clearly makes it a board issue," Robinson said. "They need to take control of it and resolve it."

Meetings canceled

In October, Wilcox urged School Board members not to renew Robinson's contract. But when they voted 4-3 to keep Robinson, the two men told the board they would work together. They planned to meet on Monday mornings.

However, of the 16 possible Monday morning meetings since then, the two have sat down only twice, according to Robinson. He said Wilcox has canceled 13 of them.

Said Wilcox: "Our offices are 50 feet apart. ... Everyone in this organization finds a way to see me when they want to."

Of the biting e-mail that went to board members, Wilcox said he wrote it after a Robinson e-mail that took him to task for not consulting the attorney on the issue of law enforcement on campuses. The urgency of Robinson's e-mail was out of proportion to the situation and the issue could have been resolved with a brief conversation, Wilcox said.

Robinson said he tried to talk to Wilcox recently on the issue. He said he wanted to make sure the superintendent's direction to principals was consistent with board policy and state law after at least two principals called his office expressing confusion.

"My goal was to have a meeting of the minds with him and make sure we were on the same page," Robinson said. "I asked if he would give me five minutes to speak to him, and he did not give me the five minutes."

'Need to get it solved'

Of six board members interviewed, only Linda Lerner staked out a position, saying: "It's clear to me Dr. Wilcox cannot choose not to work with Mr. Robinson."

The board hired Wilcox in 2004. His base salary this year is $204,509. The board hired Robinson in 2005. His base salary is $170,562.

Board member Mary Brown said the rocky relationship between Wilcox and Robinson lasted throughout her term as chairwoman, from late November 2006 to November 2007. "We need to get it solved because there are too many issues on the table," she said.

Board member Janet Clark said the dispute had become a distraction.

"Not being there 24-7, not having access to their interactions, it's real hard to know which one is right and which one is wrong," she said. "We need to do something. This can't continue."

Thomas C. Tobin can be reached at tobin@sptimes.com or 727 893-8923.

On the Web

To see School Board attorney Jim Robinson's memo to the board, which also includes superintendent Clayton Wilcox's memo to Robinson, go to education.tampabay.com.

[Last modified February 22, 2008, 00:11:03]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by warren 03/09/08 08:14 PM
Way to go Clayton! Thanks to you and your hand-picked boys,Dennis Jauch of the PTEC's and Terry Boehm of the Foundation, you finally have the District on the run and the demise of vocat.educ. in Pinellas County-a classic divide & conquer coup d'etat.
by teacher 02/25/08 06:23 PM
Wilcox name calls and becomes hostile when he doesn't get his way. Sounds like the attorney is following the rules and Wilcox doesn't like it. Bravo to Robinson for coming forward - Wilcox - we need you to grow up or get out.
by jime 02/25/08 09:16 AM
fire both their butts and get somebody who wants a job and will look after the kids first!
by Pete 02/23/08 05:03 PM
It is the attorney we need. He advises the school board. He is not a personnal attorney for Dr. Wilcox. Dr. Wilcox's attitude seems to be systemic throughout the whole District. What a morale builder this issue is and we pay for it. Bye, Doctor.
by Undecided 02/23/08 04:10 PM
Leadership is much harder then it looks to the casual observer. Name calling is easy when you don't have a stake in the game.
by kevin 02/23/08 12:46 PM
Dummp em both and replace the do-nothing cabal on the school board.
by Dick 02/23/08 10:36 AM
If Dr. Wilcox had perhaps listened to Mr. Robinson concerning violations of board policy by appointing Mr. Dennis Jauch as COO over the PTECs we wouldn't have the unholy mess with a possible unfair labor practices suit against the county to deal with
by KP 02/23/08 07:46 AM
would love to hear more from "deep throat". There have been issues with Wilcox even before Mr. Robinson came aboard. Anyone wonder why the previous atty. left? Maybe Mr. Tobin could find out....
by Janet 02/22/08 08:22 PM
It is a joke! Clayton has no clue what really happens on school grounds and how hard the staff at schools work. He and his group work where there are no children, parents, or interruptions, constantly. How much does he make again?
by Paula 02/22/08 07:28 PM
I just wonder why we can afford to pay these two such high salaries, when the money could be used to help improve our schools. From what I hear our middle schools are scary with violence. How much would that cost? $200,000???
by Mike 02/22/08 07:24 PM
I failed at leadership years ago because I was too opinionated and too strong willed. Working with difficult people that don't agree with you is lacking in Dr. Wilcox and will bring him down. Hes a harsh man; too harsh.
by deepthroat again 02/22/08 06:24 PM
i'm on the inside, give me a forum to tell the up to the moment events and you'd be shocked. like don't pay the secretaries ot but tell them if they can't do more with less go work elsewhere. he also told his prof staff same,,sad really,you think?
by by deepthroat(nixonera) 02/22/08 06:22 PM
we had a private email system that was perfect for professional use. he ordered shut down and all of us on public outlook so he can read our communications if he wishes. he rules w/iron fist. cut him loose, moral sucks
by justthinking 02/22/08 06:00 PM
It seems to me that Wilcox is preventing the attorney from doing his job! I doubt Wilcox is willing to LISTEN to anyone - not even the School Board's OWN attorney...Fire Wilcox - he's overpaid anyway!!!
by Gostrydr 02/22/08 04:41 PM
I finally figured out what I dont like about our superintendent, other then the fact he speaks out of both sides of his mouth, is that he looks looks a clean shaven version of "Bubba the Love Sponge".
by Tammy 02/22/08 03:17 PM
It was Dr. Wilcox that came up with the policy that all e-mails sent to him would be public! This one became public; if he had followed his own policy it would have never been anything else - he wants it both ways. His rule -- e-mails are public!
by Bruce 02/22/08 01:07 PM
Fire them both. Public money should not be spent on clowns who refuse to work together.
by Barb 02/22/08 12:48 PM
I've always been a supporter of Wilcox, but this time he needs to grow up, act like an adult, and be good role model for the students. Practice what you preach.
by Karen 02/22/08 12:19 PM
... and to think Wilcox is running our school system? I wouldn't allow the children in my class to act like this!
by Keggeroo 02/22/08 11:49 AM
And the education system is not like the private sector. Overpaid spoiled brats having too much time and nothing better to do. Try putting all that hot air into the classroom and talk to the kids about respect and maturity
by joey 02/22/08 11:46 AM
Try skimming about 80% off the top end of their salaries and see how they both get along or better yet let them attend sensitivity training and iron out their issues. Like little babies
by Jack 02/22/08 11:46 AM
Really? I am sure that if this were two teachers acting like children, they would be reprimanded for their conduct. This is no different. Get rid of both, they can be cart boys at Wal-Mart.
by scaredtotalk 02/22/08 11:14 AM
2ook ? if he's pd equal to top supers why arn't his teachers? his office has been painted and carpeted 3x's;looks like a museum. students no books/desks. he wants to outsource,but rakes in the bucks.and if you talk back you're toast.time to let himgo
by JT 02/22/08 10:58 AM
Ms. Gallucci should appologize for her sexist behavior in this matter. To refer to both of these high ranking officials as boys does not speak well for her outlook on equality and civil treatment much less her judgment. Is she now the girl on the SB?
by Joseph 02/22/08 09:20 AM
IF one has to go, it must be the attorney. No educator in his or her right mind would take the job if this attorney was still in the position. Either the attorney goes away or they both go away.
by students 02/22/08 08:01 AM
half a millon dollars and all they can do is bitch and cry,,,spoiled babies,,overpaid and oversized, just like the whole board,,,what a mistake this has turned into,, can we remove the entire board and re -install some new babies,,,the learners,
by stinks 02/22/08 07:57 AM
so thats what the school boards att. looks like ,,and no bodies going to mess with the att, not even the super,,, this sums up the total board..a bunch of babies cryin over simplicity ,they got issues ,,and thats the board, full of them,issue's.
by VP 02/22/08 06:00 AM
Robinson sounds like a cry baby.His unprofessional behavior in chosing to take this last dispute public leads me to believe Wilcox's statement:"Jim ... I lack any confidence in you and your ability to give me advice that is competent."
by Oh Please...... 02/22/08 05:20 AM
Robinson said..."They need to take control of it and resolve it" (they=board members). Robinson needs to put his big boy pants on, act like a grown-up and stop dragging his mommmies into this. HE needs to resolve it with Wilcox himself.
by Scott 02/22/08 05:08 AM
Two overpaid School employees, totally ignoring what they suppose to be doing... Get rid of both
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT