News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Lunsford suit seeks new look at old information
Citrus' sheriff calls the pending suit "absurd."
By Michael Kruse, Times Staff Writer
Published February 27, 2008
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[AP photo]
Mark Lunsford says the Citrus County Sheriff's Office could have saved his daughter.
|
|
JACKSONVILLE - Jessica Lunsford didn't have to die, and she wouldn't have if the Citrus County Sheriff's Office had done its job, her father and his attorneys said Tuesday in a news conference here.
Mark Lunsford and attorneys Eric Block and Mark Gelman provided more details about their pending negligence lawsuit against the Sheriff's Office. It essentially asks for a new look at old information.
It asks for belief in the idea that the 9-year-old Homosassa girl was alive for several days after she was taken in February 2005.
It asks, ultimately, for belief in the words of John Couey, drifter, drug user, admitted pedophile, Jessica's killer.
Citrus County Sheriff Jeff Dawsy, visibly agitated in a news conference of his own Tuesday in Inverness, called the pending suit "baseless" and "absurd."
"Without a doubt in my mind," he said, "I can sleep well at night knowing that I did not let Jessica down or the Lunsford family down."
Key claims in the pending suit:
- The Citrus investigation during the first two days focused too much on Mark Lunsford, and in particular on Archie Lunsford, Jessie's grandfather. Mark Lunsford said Tuesday that detectives even told him they had found his daughter's blood on his father's underwear and asked him to confront his father. "They lied to me," he said.
- Deputies went four times to the trailer where Couey was staying with other housemates, according to records, and searched the yard but never asked to search inside. It wasn't until Feb. 28, 2005, the fifth day the girl was missing, that they asked to go in. By then - if Couey is to be believed - it was too late.
- The medical examiner who did the autopsy has said Jessica probably died at least 24 hours after she last ate. If she had been killed that first night, Lunsford's attorneys argue, there would have been food in her stomach from dinner. "There's absolutely no evidence he killed her the first night," Gelman said. "None."
A month into the investigation, Couey, 49, a sex offender, confessed to taking the girl from her trailer and back to his trailer, raping her on a filthy mattress and then burying her alive in two trash bags in the back yard. He was found guilty last year and sentenced to death.
Lunsford and his attorneys gave the Sheriff's Office notice of their intent to sue last week. They now have six months to file suit.
* * *
The call about the missing girl came in at 6:45 a.m. Feb. 24, 2005.
Deputies began going door to door, knocking on Couey's trailer - which could be seen from the Lunsford home - at 8:15 a.m.
One of the housemates answered the door. Couey says he was in his back bedroom. The housemate told the deputies he hadn't seen anything strange. They left.
Their report says they searched "the perimeter of the residence."
"Everything appeared to be fine."
On a visit the next day, someone was peeking through the blinds when detectives showed up. One of the housemates hurried out a back door and then back in, and his hands were trembling when he was questioned.
But it wasn't until the fifth visit, on Feb. 28, that detectives went inside. According to their report, "nothing was found."
The Sheriff's Office started to target Couey after some tips came in. They found him on March 17 in Georgia. He confessed the next day. Investigators dug up the girl's body March 19. Couey was charged March 20.
That day, at the Citrus County Jail, he talked more with two detectives, again telling them that he did it, and how he did it - and that he kept the girl in his closet for days, until the wee hours of the day of the fifth visit, Feb. 28.
He said he kept her in the closet during the day and took her out at night.
He said she never made noise, never screamed, never tried to leave. He said she was polite.
He said he didn't rape her until that last night.
The two of them, he said, heard the investigators show up Feb. 24.
"She said, 'Are they in here now?'" Couey told the detectives. "And I said, 'Yeah, they're at the front door right now, so you sit here and be quiet. Don't say a word.' She said okay. That's what she said."
About Feb. 28, Couey told the detectives this: "See that day, y'all came in, sir ... and you weren't going to find nothing in there.
"She, she was - already I done did what I did."
Times staff writer Logan Neill contributed to this report. Michael Kruse can be reached at mkruse@sptimes.com or 813 909-4617.
[Last modified February 27, 2008, 11:08:13]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Joanne K.lin-
|
02/29/08 01:44 AM
|
|
Yea Lungsford you Greasy Fool for sure, where the heck were you the nite it happened? & Why wasn't that front door locked? I have been wanting to ask you that since it happened, Well?
|
|
by Casey
|
02/28/08 04:14 AM
|
|
He was a registered pedophile plain and simple. He should of been the first person looked at as soon as they knew this information. They went back 5 times! Thats bullshit! Jessie could have been found alive if they would of done things the right way.
|
|
by johnm59
|
02/27/08 07:59 PM
|
|
GO AWAY LUNSFORD!!!JUST GO AWAY.HAVEN'T YOU EXPLOITED YOUR DAUGHTERS DEATH ENOUGH.PERHAPS MISTAKES WERE MADE,(LIKE YOU NOT BEING THERE FOR JESSIE),YOUR A GREASY FOOL,GO FAR,FAR AWAY
|
|
by Darryl
|
02/27/08 05:11 PM
|
|
No mark the only one to blame is yourself!If you were home instead of partying with your freinds none of this may not have happened.It dosent matter who Lives next door be home with your Kids!sell your 80,000 dollar donated harley you got!
|
|
by Andrew
|
02/27/08 04:02 PM
|
|
They knew he was a convicted child molester when they went there on the 25th because their nationwide computer told them he was! So no excuses!The Citrus Co. Sheriffs offc. screwed up. The truth is - FL is an AWFUL place to raise children!
|
|
by Frank
|
02/27/08 03:59 PM
|
|
Richard-why did they wait 3 days to go back there?They could have gotten a search warrant within 24 hrs.& been there on the 25th instead of the 28th - 5 visits later! Sorry to say, but thats just unjustifiable!The guy was a convicted child molester!
|
|
by Evan
|
02/27/08 02:15 PM
|
|
Lunsford will have his day in court and he can testify and be cross examined.
The problem is with the U.S constitution that provides protection even to child killers.
Even Couey was told his Miranda rights.
|
|
by Debbie
|
02/27/08 12:35 PM
|
|
Please hear him out. Money does not solve problems however it makes people listen doesn't it? Everyone has an opinion however Lunsford lost the most precious gift God could give him. Jessica. Please open your mind Sheriff Dawsy. Admit we need change.
|
|
by Lisa
|
02/27/08 11:56 AM
|
|
Yeah right Sandi, who is going to come up for all the money for this sensational trial? Who is going to paid for any judgements? Us the tax payers! The US has turned into sue everyone & heck how it's pay for it. Yes, it's about money-not change.
|
|
by Richard
|
02/27/08 11:27 AM
|
|
Even if the deputies did identify Couey as a suspect from the beginning they still had to have probable cause to request a search warrant. They could not just go breaking into his home. That would have resulted in all the evidence being thrown out
|
|
by Tina
|
02/27/08 11:14 AM
|
|
This article excludes the undisputed and damning evidence that the Sherif failed to act on an outstanding sex offender warrant for Couey, with a missing girl next door. How do you justifying excluding that? Amazing bias, unprofessional reporting.
|
|
by Kim
|
02/27/08 11:09 AM
|
|
Jessica's disappearance and death was a complete tragedy. Mark has truly stood up as a compassionate concerned dad in so many ways. His recent threat to sue has left the public with questions regarding his true character, what will winning prove!!!
|
|
by Aaron
|
02/27/08 11:00 AM
|
|
if sueing was the only way to get the details released great but not for money it looks like if they had went inside they would have saved this child why wouldnt you go door to door, and the lie about grand father is insane. if he get $$ donate it
|
|
by Sandi
|
02/27/08 10:11 AM
|
|
I hope Stephanie never has to deal with what Mark has, pretty insensitive comments. Let an investigation find the truth, nothing wrong with that. That is what our justice system is for. My heart reaches out to all of you who knew and loved Jessica.
|
|
by Bill
|
02/27/08 09:43 AM
|
|
It's all about the money and Mark Lundsford has lost all credibility...he could have been a voice to make positive changes...but instead, he's just another money hungary person. Sad.
|
|
by TANYA
|
02/27/08 09:16 AM
|
|
I AGREE WITH MR. LUNSFORD, PERHAPS THIS WILL FORCE THE DEPT. TO MAKE CHANGES IN POLICY/PROCEDURES. COME ON, COUEY HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SUPERVISED.AS SOON AS THEY KNEW HE WAS A SEX OFFENDER HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRIMARY SUSPECT. I HOPE HE WINS CASE!!!
|
|
by Thorny
|
02/27/08 09:08 AM
|
|
It seems the Citrus Sheriff thinks he is PERFECT. He's lying, he gets paid to lie, He'll lie his fat butt off to protect it. Remember he is a professional liar by trade.
|
|
by Pinellas County
|
02/27/08 08:32 AM
|
|
If it's not about the money than sue for policy changes. It'd be hard to do that without a money grabbing attorney though. Then petition the Supreme Court to trim a little fat off the Constitution regarding illegal search and seizure.
|
|
by Stephanie
|
02/27/08 07:31 AM
|
|
Ok Mark so its not about the money its about change? Are you going to give all the money you win to charity? No I didn't think so but it will buy a pretty new motorcycle!
|
|
by Tom
|
02/27/08 06:53 AM
|
|
Hindsight is always 20/20. They should have let the attorneys handle evrything and no mistakes would have been made - yah, right. Mark is wrong to be doing this.
|