St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Contempt flies as House seeks charges

Pelosi demands a grand jury inquiry over no-shows in the prosecutor firings.

Associated Press
Published February 29, 2008


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asked the Justice Department Thursday to open a grand jury investigation into whether President Bush's chief of staff and former counsel should be prosecuted for contempt of Congress.

Pelosi, D-Calif., demanded that the department pursue misdemeanor charges against former White House counsel Harriet Miers for refusing to testify to Congress about the firings of federal prosecutors in 2006 and against chief of staff Josh Bolten for failing to turn over White House documents related to the dismissals.

She gave Attorney General Michael Mukasey one week to respond and said refusal to take the matter to a grand jury will result in the House's filing a lawsuit against the Bush administration.

The White House branded the request "truly contemptible." The Justice Department said it had received Pelosi's request and anticipated providing further guidance after Mukasey's review. It noted "long-standing department precedent" in such cases against letting a U.S. attorney refer a congressional contempt citation to a grand jury or prosecute an executive branch.

The Democratic-controlled House voted two weeks ago to hold Bolten and Miers in contempt for failing to cooperate with committee investigations.

"There is no authority by which persons may wholly ignore a subpoena and fail to appear as directed because a president unilaterally instructs them to do so," Pelosi wrote Mukasey. She noted that Congress subpoenaed Miers to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, which is investigating the firings. "Surely, your department would not tolerate that type of action if the witness were subpoenaed to a federal grand jury."

She added: "Short of a formal assertion of executive privilege, which cannot be made in this case, there is no authority that permits a president to advise anyone to ignore a duly issued congressional subpoena for documents."

White House spokesman Tony Fratto and House GOP leader John Boehner said the House should focus on passing legislation allowing the government to more easily eavesdrop on phone calls and e-mails of suspected terrorists.

Bush also pressed on that front again Thursday, urging Congress at a news conference to grant telecom companies immunity from class-action lawsuits for cooperating with U.S. intelligence services in monitoring terrorist communications.

"If any of these companies helped us, they did so after being told by our country their assistance was legal," he said.

About 40 suits have been filed in U.S. courts against telecommunications companies. Some lawmakers, including Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., say that not allowing the suits to go forward would be unfair to people on whom the government may have eavesdropped illegally.

A temporary surveillance law expired nearly two weeks ago.

Stumped by the price of gas

During President Bush's news conference Thursday, Peter Maer of CBS News Radio asked, "What's your advice to the average American who is hurting now, facing the prospect of $4-a-gallon gasoline. ... "

"Wait, what did you just say?" Bush interrupted. "You're predicting $4-a-gallon gasoline?"

"A number of analysts are predicting $4-a-gallon gasoline," Maer explained. In recent days, $4-a-gallon forecasts - made by AAA, among others - have been on the front page of the New York Times, on NBC's Today Show, in the Los Angeles Times and in many other media outlets.

"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that," Bush said. Even after Maer explained, Bush still seemed to have difficulty grasping the possibility. "You just said the price of gasoline may be up to $4 a gallon - or some expert told you that," Bush repeated. "That creates a lot of uncertainty."

Washington Post

[Last modified February 29, 2008, 01:40:04]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by JT 02/29/08 09:35 AM
Actually, $4 gas does not create any uncertainty at all for those who economize on their fuel usage and others who invested in oil related assets instead of spending all of their money on consumption items like McMansions and Hummers!!!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT