News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Deal lets courts avoid shutdown
Lawmakers come up with the money to avoid a shutdown, but it's only a reprieve.
By Alex Leary, Times Staff Writer
Published March 1, 2008
TALLAHASSEE - Hoping to avoid the spectacle of closed courtrooms, state lawmakers announced a last-minute deal Friday to plug a hole in Florida's judicial budget.
The agreement will prevent thousands of court workers from being sent home without pay in the final quarter of the fiscal year that ends June 30.
But it is a one-time deal and the court system still faces deep cuts in 2008-09.
"We're giving them a one-time bailout with a strong warning that they need to start preparing for future cuts because they are coming," said Sen. Victor Crist, R-Tampa, who oversees the Senate's criminal and civil justice budget.
Full details of the budget accord were not released, but House and Senate leaders agreed on the general terms.
The courts' budget would be cut $4.5-million through the remainder of 2007-08, instead of the original $17-million proposed earlier this week.
The cuts were part of an overall plan announced Monday to reduce state spending by $542-million this fiscal year to balance the budget in the wake of lagging tax collections.
Additionally, public defenders and state attorneys will get a slight reprieve from deeper cuts. Public defenders will see $5.4-million in cuts, down from $7-million proposed earlier this week; state attorneys will see $10.5-million in cuts, down from $13.4-million.
Court officials spread alarm recently over the budget cuts, arguing that they would have to shutter courthouses for weeks this spring as thousands of court employees were sent home without pay.
The expenses of the judicial branch are almost entirely salaries. So in the face of budget cuts, there is nowhere else to turn. In Pinellas and Pasco the deficit would have affected 244 employees; in Hillsborough that number would be 240.
That would have forced a virtual halt to civil proceedings, like divorce and foreclosure.
"Unprecedented would be the word. It's certainly something that in my 28 years as a lawyer that I've never heard had occurred in Florida," said Pinellas-Pasco Chief Judge Robert Morris Jr.
But Crist and other lawmakers said the courts were warned far in advance to hold back some money, 1 percent per quarter, as a cushion for the cuts. "If the money's not there, we can't spend it," Crist told the St. Petersburg Times earlier this week.
Nonetheless, politicians figured a fight with another branch of government and the images of empty courtrooms were not worth the hassle.
"It's like the saying, 'Justice delayed is justice denied,'" said Rep. Dick Kravitz, R-Jacksonville, chairman of the House Safety and Security Council. "I just can't see cases being delayed and court workers sent home without pay."
"I commend House leadership. I'm now just anxious to see the details," said Rep. Jack Seiler, D-Fort Lauderdale, who also worked to prevent the shutdown.
Morris said he expects next year to be lean as well, but at least court officials now have time to prepare.
"We'll have a full year to figure it out as opposed to only part of a fourth quarter," he said.
Times staff writer Chris Tisch contributed to this report.
[Last modified March 1, 2008, 13:50:36]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Rick
|
03/03/08 03:54 PM
|
|
the stupidy of cutting the budget's of the courts is laughable. The courts are the only semblence of sanity in the state now. We have an out of control legislature and an sell out for a governor who just does what the legislature wants.
|
|
by kate
|
03/03/08 11:07 AM
|
|
Technology. I have been in soooo many courts, working. They are sooo far behind in technology that it is pathetic. They would need half the workers if they would simply apply modern technology to automate what thousands are doing manually. Shame!
|
|
by Mike
|
03/01/08 11:56 AM
|
|
No money? Great! Shut'em down. This is appropriate for a judiciary that demands litigation from low income persons in civil cases, when mediation would be fast, fair, and inexpensive. Sure, mediation is on the books, but rarely available to the poor.
|
|
by Bob
|
03/01/08 10:53 AM
|
|
Maybe since the state is running out of cash, we should cut more taxes
|
|
by alan
|
03/01/08 07:56 AM
|
|
well we all knew that was comming ,,they would neve kink the judical system ,,its all a story for money ,,money money,,and we are suppose to put god first not in the pocket but the heart,,no one has one of those,,,
|
|
by david
|
03/01/08 05:01 AM
|
|
Cut out the "give-a=ways' to rich companise who have no-bid contracts to overbill without accountability. What about India? China? Outsourcing? New Lotto? FDOT? Crist's body guards? Lights on streets?
traffit signals? EM Services? Crist's staff-cut
|