News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Schools
Floridians want sex ed in schools
By Donna Winchester, Times Staff Writer
Published March 1, 2008
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Public education survey
A look at Floridians' feelings on major issues in the state's public education system.
Related stories
Education blog
|
|
St. Petersburg Times poll
|
|
|
|
|
|
An overwhelming majority of Floridians, including many who describe themselves as evangelical Christians, think public schools should teach sex education, according to a St. Petersburg Times survey.
What's more, they think the curriculum should go beyond an abstinence-only approach, covering such topics as disease prevention and contraception.
Nearly nine out of 10 Florida voters said public schools should offer some form of sex education. Of those, only 8 percent said districts should teach abstinence only, which emphasizes abstaining from all sexual behaviors and does not include information on contraception except in terms of failure rates.
The findings were similar regardless of age, income or gender. Those who described themselves as evangelical or fundamentalist Christians (about 72 respondents) were only slightly less likely to agree that students need to hear about more than abstinence.
"I have values and I try to instill them in my children," said Tony McRae, a New Port Richey father who describes himself as fundamentalist. "I'm also realistic enough to know the ways of the world. There's a lot of temptation out there, and it's not always easy to resist."
McRae, 48, who has three teenage daughters, put his eldest daughter on birth control when he found out she was sexually active. The Pasco County school system's reliance on "abstinence and wise choices" neither dissuaded his children from engaging in premarital sex, nor taught them how to protect themselves from pregnancy or disease, McRae said.
The Times survey was administered to 702 registered voters Feb. 6-10 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. It also found that:
- Respondents with school-age children were more likely to say that sex education should include information about disease prevention and contraception than respondents without children in school.
- Only 2 percent of Democrats said sex education should be abstinence only, compared with 18 percent of Republicans.
- Women were nearly twice as likely as men to say sex education should begin in elementary school.
The results came as no surprise to Brian Dodge, a former public health professor at the University of Florida who now is associate director of the Center for Sexual Health Promotion at Indiana University. Dodge said opponents of what the state Department of Education calls comprehensive sexuality education or "abstinence plus" are a vocal but very well-funded minority.
Still, Dodge said, a recent survey of Florida teachers he conducted for UF indicated that educators are influenced by those who would prefer children to hear an abstinence-only message.
"They're teaching sexuality education in stealth," Dodge said. "They're doing the best they can in a very contentious environment."
Current Florida statutes stress abstinence, but give districts the discretion to offer more. Pinellas County sixth-graders have a growth and development unit that includes information on conception but not contraception. Eighth-graders learn about condoms in relation to disease prevention, but parents must sign an opt-in form before their children can participate.
Hillsborough schools teach abstinence, but instructors will respond to student questions about safe sex precautions, and students are taught about sexually transmitted diseases.
The differences would evaporate if two South Florida lawmakers convince the Legislature that all Florida schools should emphasize abstinence while teaching students how to protect themselves from disease and pregnancy beginning in the sixth grade.
"Parents want their kids taught that abstinence is the only certain way to prevent pregnancy," said Sen. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton, a sponsor of the Healthy Teens Act. "But beyond that, this legislation provides our kids with accurate scientific information that could help to prevent teen pregnancy and save lives."
Terry Kemple, a Christian community activist in Brandon and president of the public policy group Community Issues Council, says the bill isn't likely to go far, because "most legislators see through the ruse."
"This isn't about healthy teens," Kemple said. "This is about promoting sex."
Cosette DiLorenzo of Tampa disagrees.
"Young people today need to know all the facts," said DiLorenzo, 66, the mother of two grown daughters. "Without information, it seems to me they are more likely to engage in dangerous behaviors that result in bad consequences."
Nancy Hoppe of Largo was among 17 percent of respondents who said public schools should teach comprehensive sex education without discussing abstinence at all.
"A lot of kids who try to do the abstinence thing get in trouble when they can't manage it," said Hoppe, 76. "I just think a rational approach is the better approach."
People on both sides of the debate point to statistics to bolster their arguments. In 2005, 47 percent of female high school students and 54 percent of male high school students in Florida reported having had sexual intercourse. In the same year, 12 percent of female high school students and 21 percent of male high school students reported having had four or more sexual partners.
For Kemple, those numbers signal the need for abstinence-only education.
"Do we teach kids that they're basically animals who can't control their sexual urges, so go ahead and have sex, and oh by the way, be sure to use a condom?" Kemple said. "Or do we tell them they are actually rational human beings who can avoid early sexual activity? Let's teach them the coping skills to be able to effectively do that."
For Deutch, the statistics underline the need for more comprehensive sex education. He refutes the idea that teaching abstinence alone will prevent teen pregnancy. And while information about sex ideally should come from parents, Deutch says, some parents can't or won't do the job, so it must fall to the schools.
Regardless of where they fall in the debate, nearly everyone agrees that sex education must be age appropriate, said Peggy Johns, the Pinellas school district's health supervisor. But as the Times survey indicates, there's a difference of opinion regarding the "right" age.
While the majority of respondents said sex education should be aimed at middle school students, more than one-third said it should begin in elementary school.
One way to rise above the controversy, Johns said, is to keep in mind that the information kids get in school should carry them through their lifetime.
"In our high school program, we provide family planning for future healthy behaviors," Johns said. "We go over the contraception methods for students so that as adults they'll be able to decide what's in their best interest."
Statistics
- Florida has the sixth highest teen pregnancy rate with 48,440 teenage pregnancies annually.
- Florida has the second highest AIDS rate in the country, with 4,960 new AIDS cases in 2005 and 100,809 cases overall.
- In 2006, Florida had 121,791 reported cases of sexually transmitted infections other than HIV/AIDS.
Source: www.healthyteensflorida.org
[Last modified February 29, 2008, 23:08:36]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Hyscel
|
03/06/08 07:33 AM
|
|
Why not academic freedom to teach stork theories in sex education? It will go nicely with the creationism rubbish that people are fighting for in other classes. Imagine, we will have a new generation fully indoctrinated with anti-science!
|
|
by hannah
|
03/05/08 02:59 PM
|
|
kids are out there talking about sex AND having sex no matter what you blab about in your churches and PTA meetings. why not give teens information to protect them from stopping a baby instead of how to change a diaper after the "oops moment." duh!
|
|
by Pam
|
03/04/08 02:21 PM
|
|
Ruby, THANKS for Mathmatica BUT report only said abstin. ed kids have about same rate as nonparticipants. WE KNOW that abstinence doesn't work, but WHAT DID to create one third rate drop in pregs. since 1991? SOMETHING needs to be replicated.
|
|
by KML
|
03/04/08 08:20 AM
|
|
Sex ed should be as comprehensive as possible. Abstinence leads to ignorant children who have sex w/o "knowing" they did. It leads to pregnant children. Sex ed teaches them the consequences of sex. Perhaps you want to raise your granchildren, I don't
|
|
by Buzzard
|
03/03/08 10:21 PM
|
|
LOVE those st. pete times polls. As a dear friend of mine once said...never let the facts get in the way of a good story. Is it true that most respondents also thought sexual positions should be taught?
|
|
by Dick
|
03/03/08 09:08 PM
|
|
Kids know a heck of a lot more about sex that you think. Schools should teach a no nonsense course in Sex Ed with graphic details of what happens when you get STUPID and don't protect yourself! Abstinence is great in theory, but short on reality.
|
|
by rick
|
03/03/08 08:14 PM
|
|
steve, it's because we use "your" method of no "c" word. fact: all research has shown abs only meth leads to more sex with more people w/o protection. lib meth of teaching leads to less. wake up and use science for gods sake. we are a laughable state
|
|
by Ruby
|
03/03/08 04:07 PM
|
|
Pam, google "Mathematica Report" for all answers. The national drop in pregnancies had NOTHING to do with abstinence-only education. In fact teen pregnancies ROSE in areas with this education. Here is a fact: ABSTINENCE-ONLY HARMS (NOT HELPS) YOUTH.
|
|
by Pam
|
03/03/08 03:16 PM
|
|
I SUPPORT SEX ED and think "abstinence only" is folly. HOWEVER, stats show teen preg rates DROPPED from 1991 high of 61.8 to 41.9 in 2006. See teenprenancy.org.for info.I'm confused. Could author comment? Fl. needs facts to base "opinions" upon.
|
|
by Suz E Q
|
03/03/08 01:36 PM
|
|
GIVE IT UP "john!" The percentages they found in this survery were in the 80th and 90th percentiles - harldy 0.00388062104088207%. In addition, these numbers have been reflected in almost every representative sample in the U.S. So, sorry, you lose!
|
|
by john
|
03/03/08 10:53 AM
|
|
Okay, if 0.00388062104088207%
is a majority of Floridians using 2006 census data. How can you direct the people to believe you. "The Times survey was administered to 702 registered voters Feb. 6-10 and has a margin of error" a great margin of error
|
|
by Ahava
|
03/03/08 09:46 AM
|
|
Now there is a Nobel Prize winning idea. SEX EDUCATION AND GUN SAFETY!!!!! Obviously similar issues - amazing Einstein never made that connection before. Kudos to the contributor for his sheer BRILLIANCE!!!!! I'm praying on it right now.
|
|
by Suz E Q
|
03/03/08 09:42 AM
|
|
Obviously the opposing whack jobs can't read. SPT results (9 out of 10 people want REAL sex ed in schools) mirror other samples across the board, including national. Y'all are in that annoying "vocal minority." Face the facts and shut your holes!
|
|
by Jamie Lynn
|
03/02/08 11:13 AM
|
|
Here is a radical notion. Public schools in Florida should consider operating under the Constitution of the United States WHICH GUARANTEES SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE! Anything else is treason. And unpatriotic. And a threat to national security.
|
|
by mocus1
|
03/02/08 01:16 AM
|
|
So, according to you, educating kids leads to responsible decision making....in that case, why don't you liberals propose courses on gun safety, so kids won't use guns recklessly?.....we won't hold our breaths for that to happen, hypocrites !
|
|
by steve
|
03/02/08 01:13 AM
|
|
I see, so abstinence only "doesn't dissuade people from having sex, and doesn't work", but the "open minded" liberal method does?.....then why does Florida have the 6th highese teen pregnancy and 2nd highest AIDS rate?.....because your method works?
|
|
by Julie
|
03/01/08 11:01 PM
|
|
The Times must keep a Rolodex of "Stupid Fundamentalists we can get ignorant statements from" because they never fail to deliver! Jeeez, Terry Kemple, what possible reason could the legislature have for "promoting sex"? Think before you speak!
|
|
by Carie
|
03/01/08 07:57 PM
|
|
Comprehensive Sex Ed should be taught from K1 and up with age appropriate information.If you don't know what curriculum to teach you go to www.siecus.org and look at the guidelines. I'm certified to teach the K1/4 -6 level at my UU church. It works!
|
|
by ROGER
|
03/01/08 06:33 PM
|
|
WHY IT WAS STOPPED IN THE SCOOL SYSTEMS TO BEGIN WITH IS BEYOND ME.A VERY IMPORTANT SUBJECT FOR BOTH STD PREVENTION,AND UNWANTED BIRTHS.MOST PARENTS AREN'T COMFORTABLE WITH THAT "TALK".THE SCHOOLS AND EDUCATORS ARE ABLE TO HANDLE IT VERY EFFICIENTLY.
|
|
by neil
|
03/01/08 05:15 PM
|
|
Then why did you idiots elect w??????? He is the epitome of the self sanctifying bible beater mentality who panders to his "base" by preaching abstinence only. Wake up people. You have a chance in November to start to undo his legacy of destruction.
|
|
by tim
|
03/01/08 05:02 PM
|
|
Why doesn't the state just do what comes so naturally, blame the teachers for these kids sleeping around, instead of the parents. Have an FCAT benchmark for how many kids you stopped getting pregnant or diseased. Keep this at home! Their responsibi
|
|
by jason
|
03/01/08 04:55 PM
|
|
This is another example of idiotic parents that cannot parent. It was good to see that dadjust tell his girl to use a condom after the fact of finding out that his precious little one is sleeping around. Hey, why don't we just blame teachers 4 this
|
|
by me
|
03/01/08 01:23 PM
|
|
Sorry to inform McRae..Pasco teaches abstinence until committed relationship but just in case the RN comes in to teach the contraceptive methods to boys and girls 7-9..maybe his daughter was sick that day. I have three kids and they all had the lessn
|
|
by Mimi
|
03/01/08 09:38 AM
|
|
Sexual values and mores vary from family to family.Teach your children your values.Schools have enough to do.I don't want some male teacher teaching my daughter about sex which I believe is a private act between married people.
Keep out!
|
|
by JT
|
03/01/08 09:27 AM
|
|
Once again the schools are left to do the parents job. What a bunch of Nanny Staters. In this day and age we should be smarter than this. There is no such thing as safe sex. You can get herpes and other STD's while a condom is being used. Pathetic.
|
|
by Amy
|
03/01/08 08:29 AM
|
|
"This isn't about healthy teens," Kemple said. "This is about promoting sex." Are you kidding me? What parent wants their kid out having sex. To think schools want to promote sex is crazy. Get a grip on reality.
|
|
by CP
|
03/01/08 02:17 AM
|
|
Common sense says that prevention techniques should be taught. But what would that do to NCLB money? The idea that teaching them promotes sex is ridiculous. Does teaching them history tell them to start wars? Fear should not dictate education.
|