News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Today's Letters: Secrecy on Rays stadium belies mayor's neutrality
Letters to the Editor
Published March 5, 2008
It's still early innings March 3, commentary by Rick Baker
I find it astounding that St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Baker can claim neutrality in regard to his position on the Rays' stadium proposal. Have we already forgotten that it was he and city legal and economic development staff that worked in secret on this proposal for years?
If the mayor really cared about voter input and decisionmaking, he would have had this discussion publicly before spending our tax dollars in the long process of readying this proposal for public consumption. Have we forgotten that the mayor and staff decided to keep this proposition secret until after the last City Council elections, another venue wherein voters could have had a say in the analysis of their choices?
We, the voters, know exactly where the mayor stands: pro waterfront development and pro Rays stadium proposal to be built on the backs of the taxpayer for the enrichment of the Rays' investment team. And we're not buying it, Mayor Baker. Start taking care of the real issues that concern the citizens of St. Petersburg, and stop wasting valuable time and money on this boondoggle of a plan. Still early innings? You certainly have a selective memory regarding this sad deal.
Lorraine Margeson, St. Petersburg
It's still early innings March 3, commentary by Rick Baker
Weigh all the facts before making any decision
I am a homeowner and proud resident of St. Petersburg. As part of a private citizens' coalition, Fans for Waterfront Stadium, I think that it is the responsible thing for the mayor to want to look at all the facts, and ask others to do so as well, before making any decisions. It is important for everyone to know facts, not just opinions.
Most people being heard from seem to have a very strong opinion one way or the other, myself included. I had a discussion with someone last week, a doctor and political figure, who was adamantly against the new stadium, and yet when I mentioned the proposal for the Tropicana site he knew nothing about it.
The Tropicana site and new stadium would not only provide thousands of construction jobs, but would also provide long-term job potential in the restaurants and stores of the new shopping and entertainment complex. Jobs equal economic growth and consumer spending, not to mention the sales tax revenue generated.
I am not trying to change anyone's mind. I just ask those who haven't made a decision to investigate the facts.
April Alexander, St. Petersburg
It's still early innings March 3, commentary by Rick Baker
Worth considering
I thought Mayor Rick Baker's op-ed piece was well thought out and very fair to both sides of this important proposal for our city. In addition, I applaud his comments on the Rays' ownership and "genuine desire to develop its franchise and be part of our community." Since taking over, this ownership group has kept their word on every promise made. They deserve the right to be heard.
I'm glad to see this being recognized. In addition, the possibility of a $1-billion investment into our city that would create jobs, add visibility nationally and keep commerce here in St. Petersburg certainly is worth consideration.
Kenny Locke, St. Petersburg
It's still early innings March 3, commentary by Rick Baker
The team's intentions?
Mayor Rick Baker's comments on the Opinion page about community input and the opportunity to inform the community don't jibe with actions taken. Closed-door discussions held early on about Al Lang Field with the Rays' owners and other interested parties without the knowledge of the community preclude openness.
With respect to the desire of the Rays' owners to be a part of the community, if that were so, why are they moving their team to another site for spring training? I don't see the benefit to the area.
If the Rays are the team for most of Florida, what happened to the Marlins (former World Series champs)? I know they have a problem putting fans in the seats. Is that because of their outdoor stadium?
Now we have an indoor, air-conditioned stadium with parking. I thought Rick Baker, being the mayor of St. Petersburg, might be aware that it is not the heat but the humidity, and no "sail" will change that.
Peter Kayavas, Dunnellon
When wit was in style Feb. 28
A different time
So that is what happened to America's literati! Bill Maxwell's column on the Algonquin Hotel and the fabulous writers who gathered around the Round Table in 1928 was a joy to read.
Lest you think I was there, I was not. But, as Maxwell wrote, I, too, felt it was the epitome of glamor and sophistication to read about them and revel in their wit, humor and knowledge. They represented New York City, which was blooming with theatrical and literary culture for all Americans.
So, thank you, Mr. Maxwell, for giving me a wondrous retreat back to a time far removed from our modern world. Perhaps, more's the pity.
Greta Myers, St. Petersburg
An evenhanded approach
I want to thank Major Rick Baker for his very thoughtful piece on the new stadium proposal. It's refreshing to see someone take an evenhanded approach to this issue. This is so unlike the negative approach that we have seen from so many groups and individuals who are falling over each other to kill this project. As a downtown resident, I was particularly disappointed at the downtown neighborhoods' early negative reaction to the project.
I agree that there are many issues that need to be addressed before the stadium becomes a reality, but to dismiss it out of hand in favor of yet another park makes little sense. I love parks, but we certainly don't lack for parkland on the water. You can go for more than 25 blocks in downtown visiting the waterfront on public land. If 25 percent of that land is used on any given day it is unusual.
On the other hand, a stadium can be a signature piece of a downtown. Whether it be rickety Fenway Park in Boston or the wonderful Giants stadium on the water in San Francisco, stadiums are a vibrant part of the downtown community.
Finally, we owe something to the new Rays ownership group that has gone out of its way to remove the mess that was created by the Naimoli group. The new owners are trying to bring a world championship team to our community, and they deserve our support.
David Egbert, St. Petersburg
[Last modified March 4, 2008, 22:06:40]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Justin E
|
03/06/08 01:43 PM
|
|
Yeah Tammy because how else would the Rays spread the message they're spending millions of dollars to spread?
|
|
by Matthew
|
03/06/08 01:33 AM
|
|
If the Mayor and Council so "neutral" why is it that no one will speak out against the Rays plan for fear of reprisal? Many non profit groups, builders, etc. are holding their tongues in fear. And this is a democracy?
|
|
by Tammy
|
03/05/08 10:20 PM
|
|
Thank goodness for Fans for Waterfront. Our voices can now be heard. Thank you.
|
|
by Renee
|
03/05/08 10:18 PM
|
|
St. Petersburg could benefit from the waterfront stadium. Isn't baseball supposed to be played outside??? Look at the channelside area in Tampa before the Forum arrived.
|
|
by Paul
|
03/05/08 12:02 PM
|
|
WE don't owe anything to the Rays, they bought it, they can run it. The citizens had already asked for Al Lang to be a park BEFORE any of this Rays nonsense was even known, SO, it is not a knee jerk reaction. Al Lang as a park WAS decided long ago.
|
|
by Justin E
|
03/05/08 09:33 AM
|
|
Haven't heard many non baseball fans or others without a vested interest in helping the Rays come out in support of this thing. Guess what, I'm a baseball fan and I DO NOT support this scam.
|
|
by Justin E
|
03/05/08 09:31 AM
|
|
I want to thank Mayor Baker for lying to the public. I also want to thank the Rays for creating a fake citizens group and I'd really like to thank the opportunistic people who have helped them try to fool the public.
|
|
by Justin E
|
03/05/08 09:25 AM
|
|
It's no surprise to see comments from the Rays-funded-fake-citizens-group Fansforwaterfrontstadium. You people make my stomach turn. The fact is, you are opportunistic. This plan is bad for our city, any good mayor would have seen that right away.
|
|
by JT
|
03/05/08 08:24 AM
|
|
Just don't even think about using taxpayer money to fund a new stadium or other involvement with a Professional Sports Team. Have the Rays owners offered to have a profit sharing agreement with the community? If they sell with a new stadium who wins
|
|
by Pete
|
03/05/08 08:18 AM
|
|
Tropicana site will be a flop. It will become a place to sell drugs, shoot folks in their way and a real dump. The blacks want their share as do the whites and the clash will last forever.
|
|
by JIM
|
03/05/08 08:14 AM
|
|
Why is the new stadium proposal tied to "thousands of new jobs"?Since when do the taxpayers have responsibility to provide a jobs program for people?There are many more worthwhile, necessary projects they could build.Maybe a GOOD desalination plant!
|