News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Perspective
Why McCain should worry women
By Robyn E. Blumner, Times Columnist
Published March 9, 2008
Sen. John McCain wants people to know that he is a true conservative. The right flank of his party, particularly blowhards like Rush Limbaugh, want to paint McCain as a closet pinko because he only has an 82 percent rating with the American Conservative Union. But McCain insists that his conservative credentials speak for themselves.
Believe him. They do.
What scares me most about McCain, beyond our 100-year presence in Iraq, his itchy trigger finger relative to other foes, and his enthusiasm for tax cuts for the rich, is his fiercely conservative record on women's reproductive freedom. Here, there is no moderate McCain or reach-across-the-aisle McCain. On issues related to abortion and even birth control and sex education, McCain is as ideological as any Operation Rescue activist crawling around in front of an abortion clinic.
You want to know what's coming with a McCain presidency? How about the overturning of Roe vs. Wade. I'm not kidding. The latest case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court on abortion made it clear that the two newest justices, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, will vote for substantial incursions into abortion rights, if not their outright elimination. It turns out that Roe isn't a "super-duper" precedent after all. It's now hanging by the thread of 87-year-old Justice John Paul Stevens' continued vitality.
The next president will be the decider on whether women's emancipation from the slavery of the womb will continue in this country. We are on the cusp of losing the right to control our bodies and determine our family size. McCain promises as much.
Due to McCain's reputation as a maverick, many voters seem to attach more moderate abortion views to him. In Florida's primary, for example, 45 percent of those Republicans who said abortion should be legal voted for McCain. Whereas the prochoice Rudy Giuliani won over only 19 percent of the prochoice Republican vote.
But McCain's voting record is solidly antichoice. He said directly in South Carolina that Roe "should be overturned" and strongly reiterates that position on his campaign Web site. He told the American Conservative Union that one of the three most important goals that he wants to achieve as president is to promote "a nation of traditional values that protects the rights of the unborn."
In accordance with these views, McCain promises to "nominate strict constructionist judges," which is code for "will overturn Roe if given half a chance."
McCain also supports the global gag rule - probably the most backward foreign policy initiative since the importation of slaves. This is the policy that bars foreign family planning organizations from receiving U.S. funds if the group in any way advises clients on abortion as an option or advocates for legal abortion - even when using their own funds. We know that population control and family planning is the only way for Third World nations to advance, yet the United States and its antiabortion zealots have put a foot on the neck of the most effective groups.
An intelligent person might think that someone as rabidly antiabortion as McCain would be backing approaches to prevent unwanted pregnancies, thereby, ipso facto, fewer abortions. Well, think again.
McCain is an antagonist of sensible family planning and effective sex education. In 2005, he voted "no" on a $100-million allocation for preventive health care services targeted at reducing unintended pregnancies, particularly teen pregnancies. In 2006, he voted against funding for comprehensive, medically accurate sex education for teens.
McCain is much more comfortable with President Bush's wasteful and utterly ineffective abstinence-only approach.
The New York Times Web site reported the following exchange with a reporter in Iowa in March 2007:
Q: "What about grants for sex education in the United States? Should they include instructions about using contraceptives? Or should it be Bush's policy, which is just abstinence?"
McCain: (Long pause) "Ahhh. I think I support the president's policy."
Q: "So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?"
McCain: (Long pause) "You've stumped me."
Do you really have to say such idiotic things to win the Republican nomination? It is an incontrovertible fact that the use of a condom will help interfere with HIV transmission. But I guess McCain sees it as a fact too liberal to acknowledge. Jeesh.
Now that the senator from Arizona has locked up the Republican nomination, he may be spending less time asserting his conservative bona fides and more time focusing on his occasional bipartisanship. This appeal will help to blur his record. Yet any voter who worries about government dictating to women what they can do with their bodies needs to understand the danger that McCain poses. Roe can't survive another president like Bush, and McCain is promising to be just like him.
[Last modified March 8, 2008, 01:51:25]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by steve
|
03/12/08 12:17 AM
|
|
If only McCain's mother had practiced abstinence!
|
|
by April
|
03/11/08 10:35 PM
|
|
I was sick all 9 months from an unplanned pregnancy at a young age. It was horrible, and yet I would never call myself a slave to my womb. A-I knew what sex caused. B-He is the greatest blessing of my life. He just had to get here for me to know it.
|
|
by Stan
|
03/11/08 09:35 PM
|
|
Someone sounds a little bit biased! Now I'm definitely voting for McCain...just because of you biased, bashing article!
|
|
by Jaime
|
03/11/08 09:08 PM
|
|
this story is disturbing, abstinence only is backwards, abstinence is the only 100% effective birth control method but education, freedom, and democracy is about choice. we need to educate people on all methods so each person can make their own choic
|
|
by Sal
|
03/11/08 09:00 PM
|
|
Robyn's columns always make me laugh! I never understood why this issue is so near and dear to liberal hearts and minds???
|
|
by Chris
|
03/11/08 08:15 PM
|
|
The next President can't overturn Roe v. Wade and Giuliani is not pro-choice.
Want my opinion?
My opinion is you will vote for a Democrat and there are far more important issues to vote on than a person's view on whether abortion is right.
|
|
by tom
|
03/11/08 08:01 PM
|
|
Every one voting pro life must be assigned an unwanted child on pain of imprisionment. We're building jails for the little monsters, why not for the root cause?
|
|
by scott
|
03/11/08 07:15 PM
|
|
abstinence works 100% of the time for std's and unwanted pregnancies. I you do a little research you would find it is better than just "be safe", which doesn't address the emotional issues involved in teen sex or abortions.Go Mcain, Obama/Hillary bad
|
|
by Maggie
|
03/11/08 06:44 PM
|
|
Cindy: "Robyn needs some education"? It's an opinion column. You may not agree with her, but "needs some education" sounds kinda threatening. Do you want to "educate" everyone who disagrees with you? Mark, please: "Liberal Media" isn't a candidate.
|
|
by marc
|
03/11/08 06:37 PM
|
|
i am politically conservative, but in favor of abortion because i think it helps curb the ethnic population (escpeially Robyn E. Blumnah's).
|
|
by Mark
|
03/11/08 06:25 PM
|
|
The paragraph about "Florida's Primary" makes me question your intelligence - Giuliani was out due to excessive polling/coverage and a flawed primary system before FL voted! Just like the liberal media wanted - didn't want to run against him!
|
|
by Cindy
|
03/11/08 05:59 PM
|
|
I'm not a McCain supporter, but this is one bad article. Robyn needs some education.
|
|
by chris
|
03/11/08 05:45 PM
|
|
Great article Robyn!
|
|
by Amy
|
03/11/08 05:43 PM
|
|
Anyone who surmises that an "abstinence only" approach in schools is a good idea is completely naive to what is going on in today's society. Our kids (yes yours) are bombarded with sex everyday, and won't practice safe sex if they don't learn how.
|
|
by Maggie
|
03/11/08 05:22 PM
|
|
Oh, the hypocrisy. Most of you won't admit it, but you know someone who has had an abortion, someone whose choice you've regarded as exceptional, understandable. Not a slut, not a liberal, just someone you know, someone like you. Maybe even you.
|
|
by Sharon
|
03/11/08 05:12 PM
|
|
Why is it print media and for that matter most media all about being a liberal?
|
|
by Dan
|
03/11/08 05:09 PM
|
|
Give it up St. Pete Times. What does it take for you to understand your liberal views don't sell well. Your readership is down and you can thank your liberal bias for that.
|
|
by Anna Maria
|
03/11/08 05:05 PM
|
|
Thanks for the wit and insight Robyn ... don't you have a bra burning to attend somewhere?
|
|
by Janet
|
03/11/08 05:02 PM
|
|
WOW, you just gave me all the ammunition I need to vote ... for McCain!
If a Times writer is against something, it's probably a good idea to get on board and endorse whatever it is !
|
|
by RC
|
03/11/08 04:56 PM
|
|
No, we're not a liberal newspaper!
|
|
by Sweetheart
|
03/11/08 03:55 PM
|
|
NOT having children in this day and age is far more responsible than being a drain on society. My country will nuke the US if they don't get their noses out of peoples business.
|
|
by duane
|
03/11/08 02:25 PM
|
|
John McCain is an honorable decent man and a great American who I won't vote for. He is Bush Jr. Teen pregnancies are up as are STD's in teenagers. Thanks for the abstinance programs. You're doing a great job, Bushie. IDIOT!
|
|
by Steve
|
03/11/08 02:22 PM
|
|
This story is easily the top candidate for worst article of 2008.
|
|
by sk
|
03/11/08 02:17 PM
|
|
"Reproductive Freedom" = MURDER
|
|
by Gene
|
03/11/08 02:07 PM
|
|
The rape issue is a red herring. Most abortions are a matter of choice, for as silly a reason as gender choice! Make rational arguments and someone might actually listen to you.
|
|
by pj
|
03/11/08 01:53 PM
|
|
The government should stay out of this matter. With all of the worlds problems can't the Chief Justice's find anything better to deal with. Leave it alone already. We are sick of hearing about it.
|
|
by Hussein
|
03/11/08 01:36 PM
|
|
McSame won't have the chance. He and his generation are finally being shown the door. Let's hope they don't further destroy civilization on their way out.
|
|
by ab
|
03/11/08 01:22 PM
|
|
Roe v Wade has survived more conservative presidents and Supreme Courts than the one coming up, and it's probably not going anywhere anytime soon. If it does go away, something just like it will replace it.
|
|
by LeRoy
|
03/11/08 01:22 PM
|
|
Robyn, you can control the size of your family and control of your body...JUST BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN YOU HAVE SEX...pretty easy there, isn't it?
|
|
by ARealist
|
03/11/08 01:19 PM
|
|
Roe v Wade is a blemish in the history of this country. I don't think it will ever be overturned completely, however, because of people like the author of this column.
|
|
by Eric
|
03/11/08 01:18 PM
|
|
Why are liberals so intent on killing unborn children? I thought they were so compassionate and cared about others. As to this article, just more "conservative bashing" by a hateful St. Pete Times feminist writer.
|
|
by Piobair
|
03/11/08 01:12 PM
|
|
If men got pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
|
|
by Drew
|
03/11/08 12:58 PM
|
|
Is it moral? The public's disagreement proves that there is no public policy on abortion. There is no public policy OR proven benefit to society as a whole. There should be no law passed barring abortion.
|
|
by denouement
|
03/11/08 12:41 PM
|
|
it appears that quite a few people who have the intelligence to use a computer don't know the difference between a journalistic article and an opinion piece. try to get a clue.
|
|
by Chris
|
03/11/08 12:34 PM
|
|
Hey ABC it's not all about the mother even in the case of rape. I happen to personally know a 12 year old girl who was conceived by rape (and knows it) who is very happy to be alive and very thankful her mother did not take the gift of life away.
|