News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Hernando school cops, crossing guards may be cut
Crossing guards and school officers may be on the fiscal hit lists.
By Tom Marshall and Barbara Brehredt, Times Staff Writers
Published March 12, 2008
BROOKSVILLE - Crossing guards and around half the police officers stationed in Hernando County schools are in danger of being eliminated next fall due to budget cuts, officials said Tuesday.
Sheriff Richard Nugent said he might not be able to afford his department's roughly 60-percent share of the $979,586 budget for school resource officers due to the passage in January of the Amendment 1 property tax initiative as well as declining property values.
Also endangered: his department's entire $72,421 crossing guard budget.
"This information is being provided to you in the event that our agency is no longer able to provide funding for these school-related programs," Nugent said to school superintendent Wayne Alexander in a March 6 letter obtained by the St. Petersburg Times.
Alexander said the School Board had been expecting the bad news, and would try to fund as much of the shortfall as it could.
"I knew it was coming," he added. "The School Board is going to pay for it, or at least some part of that."
The school district now pays $410,200 to station a school resource officer (SRO) in each of the county's four middle schools, two K-8 schools, and the district's alternative school. The Sheriff's Office budgets $569,386 for four officers at the high school level, plus a "floating" officer to cover for illnesses and training absences.
If the Sheriff's Office cuts those services, including the crossing guards, it would cost the School Board an extra $641,807 per year, Nugent said.
Alexander said the board might shift its SRO funds from the middle school to high school levels if the Sheriff's Office withdraws support. That could mean some middle schools will no longer have their own officer on a full-time basis, or schools might have to share an officer, he said.
"I'm sure they're essential in high schools, because I've been a high school principal," Alexander said. He said he wasn't sure how such officers were being used in middle schools, and planned to find out.
Weighing priorities
In many schools, SROs fill a wide variety of roles in addition to their primary mission of law enforcement. They teach classes on the law, supervise the cafeteria and help administrators with discipline issues.
Joe Clifford, principal at West Hernando Middle School, said SROs have helped his staff cope with rising levels of drug use and school violence.
"I had a kid arrested for battery," Clifford said. "He had marijuana, crack cocaine and methamphetamines, and that's in middle school. We have one of the lowest discipline rates of any school, but that doesn't mean that kids don't do stupid things."
As for crossing guards, Alexander said he planned to examine each of the 14 crosswalks that are currently guarded - 10 of them in high-density Spring Hill - to determine which are essential.
But district officials said they have lots of questions to ask the Sheriff's Office about the costs of both the SRO and crossing guard programs.
"How many hours do they work?" asked finance director Deborah Bruggink, referring to the crossing guards. "Are they entitled to benefits?
If the whole community benefits from putting SROs in the schools, then the schools shouldn't bear the entire cost, she added.
"I don't think we should have to absorb the full $641,000 (shortfall)," Bruggink said. "That's a lot of money."
But with the Legislature still wrangling over next year's state budget and new County Administrator David Hamilton due to start work Monday, many details are still unknown for both the school and county budgets.
"We don't know what we don't know," said Chief Deputy Michael Hensley. "Obviously we feel that it's prudent as we go forward to begin to evaluate internal programs and personnel."
With looming budget cuts, all Sheriff's Office programs will be prioritized, he said. The school programs were singled out as possible cuts because the School Board provided a possible second source of funding.
The overall sheriff's budget tops $31-million, with 80 percent going to salaries and benefits for 383 employees, including 172 in patrol and operations, Hensley said.
"All of the other things we do are extremely important," Hensley added. "But if you look at our primary mission, it is to answer calls for service, investigate crimes and take people into custody."
Tom Marshall can be reached at tmarshall@sptimes.com or (352) 848-1431. Barbara Behrendt can be reached at behrendt@sptimes.com or (352) 848-1434.
[Last modified March 11, 2008, 20:32:31]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Kathy
|
03/12/08 04:06 PM
|
|
Robert, that is the most ignorant comment I have heard. If you are not happy there are plenty of other Counties to live in. Cutting the Deputies would be a devastating move.
|
|
by Bob
|
03/12/08 03:56 PM
|
|
What a shame this would be. In this day of school violence, they are needed more than ever!! They are able to prevent so many problems from occuring. They build excellent rapport with the troubled students. Save our School Resource Deputies!!
|
|
by Linda
|
03/12/08 02:56 PM
|
|
YEDI: By the way, schools were exempt from Amendment 1 - they did not get cut like you stated.
|
|
by Linda
|
03/12/08 02:55 PM
|
|
Folks, as citizens we passed Amendment 1. Did you not think there would be cuts? We are getting what we asked for and we approved. You can't have it both ways. This is typical of knee-jerk reaction voters. The Sheriff is doing what voted for.
|
|
by sphillmom3
|
03/12/08 12:19 PM
|
|
middle school needs SRO's. you take them out & more problems will be there. Crossing guards are needed too. Find somewhere else to cut the budget.
|
|
by fred
|
03/12/08 12:17 PM
|
|
Amend 1 wont save you more than 250 bucks a year. Is it worth the cost of cutting public safety. NO
|
|
by Kate
|
03/12/08 11:30 AM
|
|
Maybe Nugent should take the money out of his over-inflated salary! Resource officers and crossing guards are vital in today's world. Find another program to cut and keep our children protected!
|
|
by ROBIN
|
03/12/08 10:55 AM
|
|
I TOTALLY AGREE, THE BUS IS NOTHING BUT A BIG WASTE.HOW MANY TIME I HAVE PASSED IT AND IT IS EMPTY! ALOT!!!!!WE HAVE DRUGS IN OUR SCHOOLS ALREADY, CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE THEN...A BIGGER MESS...OUR KIDS SHOULD COME FIRST..
|
|
by joe
|
03/12/08 10:31 AM
|
|
Thank all the people who voted for AMEND.1!As usual the people in SpringHill are always looking to save a penny! Hopefully it won't cost them there life when they need police or fire help! Hope that 20 dollars you saved on your tax bill was worth it!
|
|
by Robert
|
03/12/08 09:45 AM
|
|
It's about time, now maybe the Sheriff can do something about the traffic violations in the county.
|
|
by Stew
|
03/12/08 08:32 AM
|
|
The County should cut that wasteful Bus program instead of this.
|
|
by Tom
|
03/12/08 08:01 AM
|
|
The sky is falling...the sky is falling. Nugent says "well we might have to cut the school cops". Give me a break...cut more I say. We cant afford to keep paying for what we dont need. Lower my taxes now.
|
|
by Angela
|
03/12/08 07:54 AM
|
|
Why not cut salaries of higher ups? Chief Deputy, Sheriff? If you're going to cut the little guys out (the ones who are on the front lines), share the suffering via your wallet as well.
|
|
by Daniel
|
03/12/08 07:24 AM
|
|
Does the sheriffs office not already have the highest budget in the county? They should be able to keep our children safe, and not try to buffalo us into getting more money. Take the DARE officers out, they are useless.
|
|
by yedi
|
03/12/08 07:24 AM
|
|
How DARE Nugent to be playing politics at the expense of kids! He has an obligation to protect and serve, including in the schools. Besides, SRO's get extra pay for after-school events. This is cash-cow and they want more! Uh, schools got cut too!
|
|
by lorra
|
03/12/08 07:15 AM
|
|
i think find the money some where. i see idiots speeding going nonwhere in the school zone with lights flashing everyday.you need the guards there.a law suit from a child being killed will cost the school board more.keep our kids safe......
|
|
by Betty
|
03/12/08 06:32 AM
|
|
Are all you voters FOR Amend. 1 proud of yourselves? You should have researched what affect Amend. 1 would have on your community and not 'oh I'm going to save $ on taxes'. You just helped ruin our county's support - you DUMMIES !!!!!!
|
|
by wondering
|
03/11/08 09:44 PM
|
|
here's a question, if 10 of the 14 crossing gards are in Spring Hill, Why don't we have the people of Spring Hill pay for them? So the rest of the county has 4, yet we have to pay for Spring Hills as well? humm interesting
|