Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Scientology fights back in court
The church is seeking a restraining order to stop a new round of protests.
By Robert Farley, Times Staff Writer
Published March 12, 2008
CLEARWATER - With the Internet activist group Anonymous threatening a second round of protests against Scientology this weekend, the Clearwater-based church went to court late Tuesday, filing a petition for a temporary restraining order. The petition was filed just before the close of court Tuesday afternoon, and the St. Petersburg Times could not obtain a copy of the petition. Pat Harney, a spokeswoman for the Church of Scientology in Clearwater, confirmed the church had filed a request for a temporary restraining order, but on the advice of counsel, she refused to provide a copy of the lawsuit or discuss who it seeks to restrain. Anonymous, which describes itself as a loosely affiliated group united against the injustices perpetrated by Scientology, coalesced in January after a video of Scientologist Tom Cruise was leaked to YouTube and then promptly removed because of threats from Scientology attorneys. Members of Anonymous claimed this was an affront to the freedom of the Internet. A video message from Anonymous taunting the leaders of Scientology received more than 2-million views on YouTube. On Feb. 10, some 200 people participated in an Anonymous-organized demonstration against Scientology in downtown Clearwater. Similar protests were held in cities around the world. In Clearwater, church security videotaped and photographed protesters, most of whom disguised their faces with fake beards, face paint, scarves and bandannas. While Anonymous Web sites ask members to protest peacefully and state they mean no harm to Scientology's members, Harney said, "we have evidence to the contrary." Before the lawsuit was filed Tuesday, Harney said the church has documented threats made by members of Anonymous, and provided those threats to Clearwater police. "Of course, we are concerned about the safety of our group," Harney said. Representatives of Anonymous could not be reached for comment. This weekend's protests by Anonymous - dubbed "Party Hard" - were timed to coincide with Scientology's annual celebration of founder L. Ron Hubbard's birthday on Thursday. According to Web sites affiliated with Anonymous, members of the group plan to protest in 50 cities worldwide. In Clearwater, they will gather Friday evening outside Ruth Eckerd Hall, where Scientology will hold its annual gala event. A larger protest is planned Saturday in downtown Clearwater, where the church's international religious headquarters are located. "We are taking every security measure we can," Harney said. "We are not taking this lightly."
Read more comments on this story and share yours
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 04:23 PM
|
|
I lol'd. How can they put a restraining order against all members of Anonymous? Not even possible. Let the protests continue.
|
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:49 PM
|
|
As mentioned before, anonymous is not an organized group in any real way. Please stop reporting on this as though we have an organized leadership. All that unites us is lulz.
|
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:46 PM
|
|
It turns out you can't buy some people.
|
|
by anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:46 PM
|
|
There was a major protest a month ago with over 10,000 worldwide and the only ones arrested were members of scientology when they broke the law. This is scientology trying to stop free speech. See xenu.net and xenutv.com Stop them, Join the picket
|
|
by Matt
|
03/12/08 03:42 PM
|
|
Look, get it through your head. you can't "sue" anonymous, you can't pass any legal judgement against "anonymous" because it doesnt exist as a group, there are no leaders or official memberships or anything. there are no "representatives" of anonymou
|
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:40 PM
|
|
Two more words. Shawn Lonsdale. Suicide? Yeah, right. This cult must be stopped.
|
|
by anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:39 PM
|
|
seriously. just because there are some extremists within our groupd does not mean that weare all of that mindset. If these judges knew about anonymous, they would know none of these threats of REAL violence will happen.
|
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:37 PM
|
|
Anonymous are anonymous. Who're they going to restrain?
|
|
by Anonymous
|
03/12/08 03:36 PM
|
|
Good luck trying to get a restraining order in every major city in the world, Co$.
|
|
by Shocklink
|
03/12/08 03:11 PM
|
|
I don't understand why you want to restrain people for protests, you don't see a Nuclear Company wanting to restrain people protesting for nuclear free area. Just do what the Nuclear company do, IGNORE.
|
|