St. Petersburg Times Online: News of Florida
Place an Ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather
  • Delta grounds man over legal pot stash
  • Dentists accused in Medicaid con
  • Aisenbergs' lawyers press fee demands
  • High court ousts Manatee judge

  • From the state wire

  • Hurricane Jeanne appears on track to hit Florida's east coast
  • Rumor mill working overtime after Florida hurricanes
  • Developments associated with Hurricanes Ivan and Jeanne
  • Four killed in Panhandle plane crash were on Ivan charity mission
  • Hurricane Frances caused estimated $4.4 billion in insured damage
  • Disabled want more handicapped-accessible voting machines
  • USF forces administrators to resign over test score changes
  • Man's death at Universal Studios ruled accidental
  • State child welfare workers in Miami fail to do background checks
  • Hurricane Jeanne heads toward southeast U.S. coast
  • Hurricane Jeanne spurs more anxiety for storm-weary Floridians
  • Mistrial declared in case where teen was target of racial "joke"
  • Panhandle utility wants sewer plant moved to higher ground
  • State employee arrested on theft, bribery charges
  • Homestead house fire kills four children, one adult
  • Pierson leader tries to cut off relief to local fern cutters
  • Florida's high court rules Terri's law unconstitutional
  • Jacksonville students punished for putting stripper pole in dorm
  • FEMA handling nearly 600,000 applications for help
  • Man who killed wife, niece, self also killed mother in 1971
  • Producer sues city over lead ball fired by Miami police
  • Tourism suffers across Florida after pummeling by hurricanes
  • Key dates in the life of Terri Schiavo
  • An excerpt from the unanimous ruling in the Schiavo case
  • Four confirmed dead after small plane crash in Panhandle
  • Correction: Disney-Cruise Line story

    printer version

    Aisenbergs' lawyers press fee demands

    The legal team represents the couple exonerated when prosecutors dropped the missing-child case.


    © St. Petersburg Times,
    published August 17, 2001

    TAMPA -- Barry Cohen wants the federal government to pay up. But he also wants a chance to show just how unfairly his clients, Steve and Marlene Aisenberg, were treated.

    Cohen began representing the former Valrico couple shortly after they reported the disappearance of their 5-month-old daughter, Sabrina, in 1997.

    In February, federal prosecutors dropped the charges and last month agreed the case against the couple had been brought in bad faith. They agreed to pay the couple's legal fees and expenses, but contested the $3.75-million total Cohen demanded.

    In a written response to prosecutors filed Thursday, Cohen said he and his colleagues deserve the entire amount. He also wants a judge to order the entire investigative file be turned over to the court or to Cohen, and to compel the investigators and prosecutors in the case to submit to depositions.

    "The prosecutors should not be allowed to admit they were wrong and then pay some money and brush the whole thing under the carpet," Cohen said. "We need to know the truth."

    U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday could take several months to make a decision.

    Investigators suspected the Aisenbergs soon after Sabrina was reported missing Nov. 24, 1997. Authorities bugged their home, and a grand jury indicted them in 1999 on charges of conspiracy and making false statements.

    The charges were dropped in February after a federal judge recommended some of the tapes be suppressed. The judge said the detectives had acted recklessly in getting permission to bug the home and that the tapes he reviewed did not contain the incriminating statements that the detectives said they contained.

    The Aisenbergs filed a claim using the Hyde Amendment, a 4-year-old law that allows federal criminal defendants to collect fees and costs if the prosecution was "frivolous, vexatious or in bad faith."

    In the initial motion, Cohen and his law partner, Todd Foster, asked for $1.67-million in fees for the legal team. The motion also asked for costs that included legal research, travel, telephone bills and fees for expert witnesses.

    The Hyde Amendment provides judges with the power to double the amount if the case includes certain factors such as particularly difficult legal issues or the need for special litigation skills. The motion argued that those requirements were met and the amount should be doubled.

    The government stated in July that the hourly fees were too high and that the case didn't meet any of the requirements to increase the award.

    Back to State news
    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
    Special Links
    Lucy Morgan

    From the Times state desk