|
|
||
Why Pam Brown?By BILL DURYEA © St. Petersburg Times, published December 26, 1999
The University of Florida professor has never met her, but he has been conjuring an image of her for quite some time. He has had help from Lance deHaven-Smith, a professor at Florida State with whom he is writing a book provisionally (and not so imaginatively) titled Florida: Looking to the Future. The following exchange was created by splicing together their independent descriptions of the Most Important Person in Florida. Colburn: "She's a woman. She's white. She's college educated." deHaven-Smith: "She had a career, had a family." Colburn: "She worked, but not for equal pay." deHaven-Smith: "She's divorced, maybe widowed." Colburn: "She's concerned about women, but she's not necessarily a member of NOW. She's environmentally conscious, but she's not necessarily a member of a group." dehaven-Smith: "This is a woman who burned her bra, that quit making coffee for her boss. She told you to stop calling her "girl,' who expected her husband to help clean up the house. It's the return of the '60s radical with gray hair." Colburn: "I don't buy that argument. I edited all that stuff out of the book." deHaven-Smith: "She was turned off by organized religion, but she yearns for spirituality." Colburn: "She supports education, because that's where (women) made their success." deHaven-Smith: "She became a Republican, but she's liberal on race issues." Colburn: "(She) voted for Reagan, but wasn't fully comfortable with the Reagan Revolution." Later, you ask Brown if she recognizes herself in that description. "A lot of that is me," she says. "I wasn't a bra-burner. I wasn't that militant." The religious conversion is spot on, she says. So is the support for education. But there is one thing that she disagrees with completely. "I never would have voted for Reagan." |
![]() |
|
|
|
||